Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorExpert Panel on Vascular Imaging
dc.contributor.authorOliva, Isabel B.
dc.contributor.authorDay, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorDill, Karin E.
dc.contributor.authorHanley, Michael
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Osmanuddin
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Shelby J.
dc.contributor.authorDesjardins, Benoit
dc.contributor.authorGage, Kenneth L.
dc.contributor.authorGinsburg, Michael
dc.contributor.authorHamawy, Adam H.
dc.contributor.authorSteigner, Michael L.
dc.contributor.authorStrax, Richard
dc.contributor.authorVerma, Nupur
dc.contributor.authorRybicki, Frank J.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:47.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:20:13Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:20:13Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-01
dc.date.submitted2018-01-03
dc.identifier.citationJ Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Nov;14(11S):S456-S461. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.047. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.047">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1546-1440 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.047
dc.identifier.pmid29101984
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48254
dc.description.abstractBreast cancer is the most common malignancy in women in the United States. Breast reconstruction surgery is a commonly used therapy for patients with breast cancer. The technique for the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap uses a preserved rectus muscle, which decreases donor site morbidity. Accurate identification and measurement of the perforator branches of the deep inferior epigastric artery is pivotal during pre-operative planning so that the surgeon can prioritize the best vessel to use and ultimately improve clinical outcome. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=29101984&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.047
dc.subjectAUC
dc.subjectAppropriate Use Criteria
dc.subjectAppropriateness Criteria
dc.subjectBreast cancer
dc.subjectBreast reconstruction surgery
dc.subjectDeep inferior epigastric artery
dc.subjectDeep inferior epigastric perforator
dc.subjectCardiovascular System
dc.subjectNeoplasms
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleACR Appropriateness Criteria((R)) Imaging of Deep Inferior Epigastric Arteries for Surgical Planning (Breast Reconstruction Surgery)
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
dc.source.volume14
dc.source.issue11S
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/radiology_pubs/366
dc.identifier.contextkey11314512
html.description.abstract<p>Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women in the United States. Breast reconstruction surgery is a commonly used therapy for patients with breast cancer. The technique for the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap uses a preserved rectus muscle, which decreases donor site morbidity. Accurate identification and measurement of the perforator branches of the deep inferior epigastric artery is pivotal during pre-operative planning so that the surgeon can prioritize the best vessel to use and ultimately improve clinical outcome. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathradiology_pubs/366
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiology
dc.source.pagesS456-S461


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record