ACR Appropriateness Criteria((R)) Suspected Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Bennett, Shelby J.Dill, Karin E.
Hanley, Michael
Ahmed, Osmanuddin
Desjardins, Benoit
Gage, Kenneth L.
Ginsburg, Michael
Khoynezhad, Ali
Oliva, Isabel B.
Steigner, Michael L.
Strax, Richard
Verma, Nupur
Rybicki, Frank J.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of RadiologyDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2018-05-01Keywords
AneurysmAorta
Aortic Appropriateness Criteria
Appropriate Use Criteria
AUC
Thoracic
TAA
Cardiovascular Diseases
Radiology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Although the incidence of thoracic aortic aneurysm is on the rise, initial imaging diagnosis can present a challenge for many clinicians. Providers are faced with many imaging choices as part of the initial workup. Considering level of invasiveness, relative radiation level, and quality of associated diagnostic data, CT angiography and MR angiography are believed to be the most appropriate options for radiological diagnosis of suspected thoracic aortic aneurysm. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.Source
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 May;15(5S):S208-S214. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.031. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.031Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48281PubMed ID
29724424Related Resources
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.031