Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMilburn, James Michael
dc.contributor.authorHeitkamp, Darel E.
dc.contributor.authorJay, Ann K.
dc.contributor.authorSarkany, David
dc.contributor.authorAli, Kamran
dc.contributor.authorDeBenedectis, Carolynn M
dc.contributor.authorEngland, Eric
dc.contributor.authorHo, Christopher P.
dc.contributor.authorKalia, Vivek
dc.contributor.authorKumm, Todd R.
dc.contributor.authorOng, Seng
dc.contributor.authorPaladin, Angelisa M.
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Maitray D.
dc.contributor.authorSwanson, Jonathan O.
dc.contributor.authorHirsch, Joshua A.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:48.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:20:39Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:20:39Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-29
dc.date.submitted2019-06-12
dc.identifier.citation<p>Acad Radiol. 2019 Apr 29. pii: S1076-6332(19)30166-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.03.012. [Epub ahead of print] <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.03.012">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1076-6332 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.acra.2019.03.012
dc.identifier.pmid31047793
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48347
dc.description.abstractRATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Several major medical specialties have recently considered delaying the start date of their fellowship training programs to allow for completion of their trainees' residency obligations. Radiology program directors (PDs) have voiced the need for a similar solution, as fellowship start dates at some institutions now occur well before the end of residency training. The objectives of this study are to assess the current state of the radiology fellowship transition and understand its impact on residency programs and clinical services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Survey Monkey (Palo Alto, CA) was used to create a survey consisting of 9 multiple choice and 2 free text questions. The survey was approved by the survey committee of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR) and distributed via email to all 240 APDR members in November 2018. The survey was closed after 30 days. RESULTS: The response rate was 67% (160/240). Fifty-nine percent of respondents indicated some of their residents are asked to arrive at fellowships before July 1, often several days early for orientation and picture archiving and communication system (PACS) training. Sixteen percent of respondents said their own institutions ask incoming fellows to arrive early. Sixty-four percent of respondents indicated that this causes staffing problems. Seventy-eight percent of respondents supported considering a delay to the start of radiology fellowships. CONCLUSION: Most APDR members claim that residents are asked to arrive at fellowships early to complete orientation and training before July 1, and most say that this produces staffing problems on services. A significant majority of respondents support a discussion regarding delaying fellowship start dates.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=31047793&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.03.012
dc.subjectAPDR
dc.subjectDelay
dc.subjectFellowship
dc.subjectGraduate medical education
dc.subjectOrientation
dc.subjectResidency
dc.subjectStart date
dc.subjectSurvey
dc.subjectMedical Education
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.titleShould Radiology Delay the Start of Fellowships? A Survey of the APDR
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleAcademic radiology
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/radiology_pubs/458
dc.identifier.contextkey14725338
html.description.abstract<p>RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Several major medical specialties have recently considered delaying the start date of their fellowship training programs to allow for completion of their trainees' residency obligations. Radiology program directors (PDs) have voiced the need for a similar solution, as fellowship start dates at some institutions now occur well before the end of residency training. The objectives of this study are to assess the current state of the radiology fellowship transition and understand its impact on residency programs and clinical services.</p> <p>MATERIALS AND METHODS: Survey Monkey (Palo Alto, CA) was used to create a survey consisting of 9 multiple choice and 2 free text questions. The survey was approved by the survey committee of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR) and distributed via email to all 240 APDR members in November 2018. The survey was closed after 30 days.</p> <p>RESULTS: The response rate was 67% (160/240). Fifty-nine percent of respondents indicated some of their residents are asked to arrive at fellowships before July 1, often several days early for orientation and picture archiving and communication system (PACS) training. Sixteen percent of respondents said their own institutions ask incoming fellows to arrive early. Sixty-four percent of respondents indicated that this causes staffing problems. Seventy-eight percent of respondents supported considering a delay to the start of radiology fellowships.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: Most APDR members claim that residents are asked to arrive at fellowships early to complete orientation and training before July 1, and most say that this produces staffing problems on services. A significant majority of respondents support a discussion regarding delaying fellowship start dates.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathradiology_pubs/458
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiology


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record