A brief evaluation of tumor imaging in mice with 99mTc-glucarate including a comparison with 18F-FDG
Authors
Cheng, DengfengRusckowski, Mary
Wang, Yuzhen
Liu, Yuxia
Liu, Guozheng
Liu, Xinrong
Hnatowich, Donald J.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear MedicineDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2011-01-01Keywords
AnimalsFemale
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Glucaric Acid
Mice
Mice, Nude
Neoplasm Transplantation
Neoplasms
Organotechnetium Compounds
Positron-Emission Tomography
Radiopharmaceuticals
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
Transplantation, Heterologous
Tumor Cells, Cultured
18F-FDG
99mTc-glucarate
positron emission tomography (PET)
single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)
molecular imaging
tumor
Small Animal SPECT/CT
Radioactive Tracers
PET
Tumor Model
Cancer Biology
Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry
Medicinal-Pharmaceutical Chemistry
Radiology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Recently 99mTc-glucarate, a radiolabeled glucose analogue, has been considered as a SPECT alternative to 18F-FDG and PET for non-invasive detection of certain tumors. Thus far there have been few studies on (99m) Tcglucarate for tumor imaging and fewer, if any, studies comparing (99m)Tc-glucarate with 18F-FDG. As a preliminary indication of the properties of (99m)Tc-glucarate as a possible substitute for 18F-FDG in animal studies, we have imaged mice bearing xenografts of four tumor types with (99m)Tc-glucarate and have compared in two mice with one of these tumor types the 99mTc and 18F biodistributions. METHODS: Two mice bearing SUM190 breast cancer xenografts received 1 mCi of (99m)Tc-glucarate and were imaged on a NanoSPECT/CT small animal camera. One day later, the same animals received 1 mCi of 18F-FDG and were imaged on a MosaicHP PET small animal camera. In addition, 0.5-1 mCi of (99m)Tc-glucarate only was administered to mice bearing xenografts induced by BxPC3 pancreatic cancer cells, HEK-293 renal cell carcinomas cells or HCT-116 colorectal tumor cells. NanoSPECT/CT acquisitions were performed in these mice to evaluate tumor accumulations. RESULTS: In the SUM190 xenografted mice, the average tumor accumulation was 1.4 % (ID%/cm3) for (99m)Tc-glucarate and 2.1 % (ID%/cm3) for 18F-FDG. While slightly higher than (99m)Tc-glucarate, the tumor accumulation of 18F-FDG was accompanied by higher bone marrow and muscle accumulations at levels that could interfere with the tumor image depending upon location. The whole body clearance of (99m)Tc-glucarate was faster than that of 18F-FDG. Tumor accumulation of (99m)Tc-glucarate varied among tumor types but the tumors were readily visible in all images. CONCLUSION: In a direct comparison in the same two SUM190 tumored animals, SPECT images obtained with (99m)Tcglucarate compared favorably with PET images obtained with 18F-FDG. Tumor images with 99mTc-glucarate were also positive in three additional tumor mouse models. While further comparison studies are necessary, we conclude that (99m)Tcglucarate may be a more convenient and less expensive alternative to 18F-FDG for tumored mouse studies.Source
Curr Radiopharm. 2011 Jan;4(1):5-9. DOI: 10.2174/1874471011104010005DOI
10.2174/1874471011104010005Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48349PubMed ID
22191610Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2174/1874471011104010005