Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorExpert Panel on Vascular Imaging
dc.contributor.authorCollard, Michael
dc.contributor.authorSutphin, Patrick D.
dc.contributor.authorKalva, Sanjeeva P.
dc.contributor.authorMajdalany, Bill S.
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Jeremy D.
dc.contributor.authorEldrup-Jorgensen, Jens
dc.contributor.authorFrancois, Christopher J.
dc.contributor.authorGanguli, Suvranu
dc.contributor.authorGunn, Andrew J.
dc.contributor.authorKendi, A. Tuba
dc.contributor.authorKhaja, Minhajuddin S.
dc.contributor.authorObara, Piotr
dc.contributor.authorReis, Stephen P.
dc.contributor.authorVijay, Kanupriya
dc.contributor.authorDill, Karin E.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:48.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:20:42Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:20:42Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-01
dc.date.submitted2019-06-12
dc.identifier.citation<p>J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 May;16(5S):S2-S6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.005. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.005">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1546-1440 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.005
dc.identifier.pmid31054747
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48359
dc.description.abstractAbdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is defined as aneurysmal dilation of the abdominal aorta to 3 cm or greater. A high degree of morbidity and mortality is associated with AAA rupture, and imaging surveillance plays an essential role in mitigating the risk of rupture. Aneurysm size and growth rate are factors associated with the risk of rupture, thus surveillance imaging studies must be accurate and reproducible to characterize aneurysm size. Ultrasound, CT angiography, and MR angiography provide an accurate and reproducible assessment of size, while radiographs and aortography provide limited evaluation. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=31054747&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.005
dc.subjectAUC
dc.subjectAbdominal aortic aneurysm
dc.subjectAbdominal prevention and control
dc.subjectAortic aneurysm
dc.subjectAortic rupture
dc.subjectAppropriate Use Criteria
dc.subjectAppropriateness Criteria
dc.subjectCT angiography
dc.subjectMR angiography
dc.subjectUltrasound
dc.subjectCardiovascular Diseases
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.subjectTherapeutics
dc.titleACR Appropriateness Criteria ((R)) Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Follow-up (Without Repair)
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
dc.source.volume16
dc.source.issue5S
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/radiology_pubs/469
dc.identifier.contextkey14725353
html.description.abstract<p>Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is defined as aneurysmal dilation of the abdominal aorta to 3 cm or greater. A high degree of morbidity and mortality is associated with AAA rupture, and imaging surveillance plays an essential role in mitigating the risk of rupture. Aneurysm size and growth rate are factors associated with the risk of rupture, thus surveillance imaging studies must be accurate and reproducible to characterize aneurysm size. Ultrasound, CT angiography, and MR angiography provide an accurate and reproducible assessment of size, while radiographs and aortography provide limited evaluation. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathradiology_pubs/469
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiology
dc.source.pagesS2-S6


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record