Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZaidat, Osama O
dc.contributor.authorPuri, Ajit S
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:48.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:20:45Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:20:45Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-09
dc.date.submitted2019-08-08
dc.identifier.citation<p>Front Neurol. 2019 Jul 9;10:737. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00737. eCollection 2019. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00737">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1664-2295 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fneur.2019.00737
dc.identifier.pmid31338061
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48374
dc.description<p>Full author list omitted for brevity. For the full list of authors, see article.</p>
dc.description.abstractBackground and Purpose: To describe the final results of the TARGET Registry, a multicenter, real-world study of patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with new generation TARGET Coils. . Methods: The TARGET Registry is a prospective, single-arm study with independent medical event monitoring and core-lab adjudication. Patients with de novo intracranial aneurysms were embolized with either TARGET-360 degrees or helical coils in 12 US centers. The primary outcome was aneurysm packing density (PD), which was assessed immediately post-procedure. The secondary outcomes were immediate and long-term aneurysm occlusion rate using the Raymond Scale, and independent functional outcome using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). A secondary analysis investigated the influence of the use of 100% 360-complex coils on clinical and angiographic outcomes. Results: 148 patients with 157 aneurysms met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. 58 (39.2%) patients with ruptured and 90 (61.8%) with unruptured aneurysms were treated using TARGET 360 degrees , helical Coils, or both. Median age was 58.3 (IQR 48.1-67.4), 73% female, and 71.6% were Caucasian. Median follow-up time was 5.9 (IQR 4.0-6.9) months. The majority were treated with TARGET 360-coils (63.7%), followed by mixed and helical coils only. Peri-procedural morbidity and mortality was seen in 2.7% of patients. A good outcome at discharge (mRS 0-2) was seen in 89.9% of the full cohort, and in 84.5 and 93.3% in the ruptured and unruptured patients, respectively. The median packing density was 28.8% (IQR 20.3-41.1). Long-term complete and near complete occlusion rate was seen in 90.4% of aneurysms and complete obliteration was seen in 66.2% of the aneurysms. No significant difference in clinical and angiographic outcomes were noted between the pure 360-complex coiling vs. mixed 360-complex/Helical coiling strategies. In a multivariate analysis, predictors for long-term aneurysm occlusion were aneurysm location, immediate occlusion grade, and aneurysm size. The long-term independent functional outcome was achieved in 128/135 (94.8%) patients and all-cause mortality was seen in 3/148 (2%) patients. Conclusion: In the multicenter TARGET Registry, two-thirds of aneurysms achieved long-term complete occlusion and 91.0% achieved complete or near complete occlusion with excellent independent functional outcome. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT01748903.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=31338061&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.rightsCopyright © 2019 Zaidat, Castonguay, Rai, Badruddin, Mack, Alshekhlee, Shah, Hussain, Kabbani, Bulsara, Taqi, Janardhan, Patterson, Nordhaus, Elijovich and Puri. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectSAH
dc.subjectaneurysm
dc.subjectcoiling
dc.subjectocclusion
dc.subjectruptured aneurysm
dc.subjecttarget coils
dc.subjecttarget registry
dc.subjectAnalytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment
dc.subjectCardiovascular Diseases
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectNervous System Diseases
dc.subjectNeurology
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.titleTARGET(R) Intracranial Aneurysm Coiling Prospective Multicenter Registry: Final Analysis of Peri-Procedural and Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Results
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleFrontiers in neurology
dc.source.volume10
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1494&amp;context=radiology_pubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/radiology_pubs/484
dc.identifier.contextkey15082120
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T17:20:46Z
html.description.abstract<p>Background and Purpose: To describe the final results of the TARGET Registry, a multicenter, real-world study of patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with new generation TARGET Coils. .</p> <p>Methods: The TARGET Registry is a prospective, single-arm study with independent medical event monitoring and core-lab adjudication. Patients with de novo intracranial aneurysms were embolized with either TARGET-360 degrees or helical coils in 12 US centers. The primary outcome was aneurysm packing density (PD), which was assessed immediately post-procedure. The secondary outcomes were immediate and long-term aneurysm occlusion rate using the Raymond Scale, and independent functional outcome using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). A secondary analysis investigated the influence of the use of 100% 360-complex coils on clinical and angiographic outcomes.</p> <p>Results: 148 patients with 157 aneurysms met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. 58 (39.2%) patients with ruptured and 90 (61.8%) with unruptured aneurysms were treated using TARGET 360 degrees , helical Coils, or both. Median age was 58.3 (IQR 48.1-67.4), 73% female, and 71.6% were Caucasian. Median follow-up time was 5.9 (IQR 4.0-6.9) months. The majority were treated with TARGET 360-coils (63.7%), followed by mixed and helical coils only. Peri-procedural morbidity and mortality was seen in 2.7% of patients. A good outcome at discharge (mRS 0-2) was seen in 89.9% of the full cohort, and in 84.5 and 93.3% in the ruptured and unruptured patients, respectively. The median packing density was 28.8% (IQR 20.3-41.1). Long-term complete and near complete occlusion rate was seen in 90.4% of aneurysms and complete obliteration was seen in 66.2% of the aneurysms. No significant difference in clinical and angiographic outcomes were noted between the pure 360-complex coiling vs. mixed 360-complex/Helical coiling strategies. In a multivariate analysis, predictors for long-term aneurysm occlusion were aneurysm location, immediate occlusion grade, and aneurysm size. The long-term independent functional outcome was achieved in 128/135 (94.8%) patients and all-cause mortality was seen in 3/148 (2%) patients.</p> <p>Conclusion: In the multicenter TARGET Registry, two-thirds of aneurysms achieved long-term complete occlusion and 91.0% achieved complete or near complete occlusion with excellent independent functional outcome.</p> <p>Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT01748903.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathradiology_pubs/484
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiology
dc.source.pages737


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
fneur_10_00737.pdf
Size:
479.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © 2019 Zaidat, Castonguay, Rai, Badruddin, Mack, Alshekhlee, Shah, Hussain, Kabbani, Bulsara, Taqi, Janardhan, Patterson, Nordhaus, Elijovich and Puri. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2019 Zaidat, Castonguay, Rai, Badruddin, Mack, Alshekhlee, Shah, Hussain, Kabbani, Bulsara, Taqi, Janardhan, Patterson, Nordhaus, Elijovich and Puri. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.