Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTen Brinck, Michelle F. M.
dc.contributor.authorJager, Maike
dc.contributor.authorde Vries, Joost
dc.contributor.authorGrotenhuis, J. Andre
dc.contributor.authorAquarius, Rene
dc.contributor.authorMorkve, Svein H.
dc.contributor.authorRautio, Riitta
dc.contributor.authorNumminen, Jussi
dc.contributor.authorRaj, Rahul
dc.contributor.authorWakhloo, Ajay K.
dc.contributor.authorPuri, Ajit S.
dc.contributor.authorTaschner, Christian A.
dc.contributor.authorBoogaarts, Hieronymus D.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:48.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:20:49Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:20:49Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-24
dc.date.submitted2019-09-25
dc.identifier.citation<p>J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Aug 24. pii: neurintsurg-2019-015077. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015077. [Epub ahead of print] <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015077">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1759-8478 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015077
dc.identifier.pmid31446429
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48387
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flow diverters are sometimes used in the setting of acutely ruptured aneurysms. However, thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications are feared and evidence regarding safety is limited. Therefore, in this multicenter study we evaluated complications, clinical, and angiographic outcomes of patients treated with a flow diverter for acutely ruptured aneurysms. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of 44 consecutive patients who underwent flow diverter treatment within 15 days after rupture of an intracranial aneurysm at six centers. The primary end point was good clinical outcome, defined as modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) 0-2. Secondary endpoints were procedure-related complications and complete aneurysm occlusion at follow-up. RESULTS: At follow-up (median 3.4 months) 20 patients (45%) had a good clinical outcome. In 20 patients (45%), 25 procedure-related complications occurred. These resulted in permanent neurologic deficits in 12 patients (27%). In 5 patients (11%) aneurysm re-rupture occurred. Eight patients died resulting in an all-cause mortality rate of 18%. Procedure-related complications were associated with a poor clinical outcome (mRS 3-6; OR 5.1(95% CI 1.0 to 24.9), p=0.04). Large aneurysms were prone to re-rupture with rebleed rates of 60% (3/5) vs 5% (2/39) (p=0.01) for aneurysms with a size > /=20 mm and < 20 mm, respectively. Follow-up angiography in 29 patients (median 9.7 months) showed complete aneurysm occlusion in 27 (93%). CONCLUSION: Flow diverter treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms was associated with high rates of procedure-related complications including aneurysm re-ruptures. Complications were associated with poor clinical outcome. In patients with available angiographic follow-up, a high occlusion rate was observed.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=31446429&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015077
dc.subjectendovascular techniques
dc.subjectflow diversion
dc.subjectintracranial aneurysm
dc.subjectsubarachnoid hemorrhage
dc.subjectAnalytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment
dc.subjectCardiovascular Diseases
dc.subjectNervous System Diseases
dc.subjectNeurology
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleFlow diversion treatment for acutely ruptured aneurysms
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of neurointerventional surgery
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/radiology_pubs/498
dc.identifier.contextkey15425131
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flow diverters are sometimes used in the setting of acutely ruptured aneurysms. However, thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications are feared and evidence regarding safety is limited. Therefore, in this multicenter study we evaluated complications, clinical, and angiographic outcomes of patients treated with a flow diverter for acutely ruptured aneurysms.</p> <p>METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of 44 consecutive patients who underwent flow diverter treatment within 15 days after rupture of an intracranial aneurysm at six centers. The primary end point was good clinical outcome, defined as modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) 0-2. Secondary endpoints were procedure-related complications and complete aneurysm occlusion at follow-up.</p> <p>RESULTS: At follow-up (median 3.4 months) 20 patients (45%) had a good clinical outcome. In 20 patients (45%), 25 procedure-related complications occurred. These resulted in permanent neurologic deficits in 12 patients (27%). In 5 patients (11%) aneurysm re-rupture occurred. Eight patients died resulting in an all-cause mortality rate of 18%. Procedure-related complications were associated with a poor clinical outcome (mRS 3-6; OR 5.1(95% CI 1.0 to 24.9), p=0.04). Large aneurysms were prone to re-rupture with rebleed rates of 60% (3/5) vs 5% (2/39) (p=0.01) for aneurysms with a size > /=20 mm and < 20 mm, respectively. Follow-up angiography in 29 patients (median 9.7 months) showed complete aneurysm occlusion in 27 (93%).</p> <p>CONCLUSION: Flow diverter treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms was associated with high rates of procedure-related complications including aneurysm re-ruptures. Complications were associated with poor clinical outcome. In patients with available angiographic follow-up, a high occlusion rate was observed.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathradiology_pubs/498
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiology, New England Center for Stroke Research


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record