Positive Predictive Value of Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsies of Architectural Distortions Seen on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and without an Ultrasound Correlate
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of RadiologyDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2019-11-18Keywords
Architectural distortionBreast
Cancer
Digital breast tomosynthesis
Positive predictive value
Diagnosis
Neoplasms
Radiology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Objective: The objective of the study was to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of architectural distortions (AD) observed on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and without an ultrasound (US) correlate. Materials and Methods: In this single-institution, retrospective study, patients who underwent DBT-guided biopsies of AD without any associated findings on digital mammography (DM) or DBT, and without a correlate on targeted US exam, over a 14-month period were included in this study. All patients had DM and DBT and targeted US exams. The PPV was computed along with the exact 95% confidence limits (CL) using simple binomial proportions, with histopathology as the reference standard. Results: A total of 45 ADs in 45 patients met the inclusion criteria. Histopathology indicated 6/45 (PPV: 13.3%, CL: 5.1-26.8%), ADs were malignant, including one high-risk lesion that was upgraded at surgery. ADs were appreciated only on DBT in 12/45 (26.7%) patients, and on both DBT and DM in 33/45 (73.3%) patients, and the corresponding PPV was 25% (3/12, CL: 5.5-57.2%) and 9.1% (3/33, CL: 1.9-24.3%), respectively. In all analyses, the observed PPV significantly exceeded the 2% probability of malignancy for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System-3 diagnostic categories (P < 0.004). Conclusions: The PPV of malignancy in DBT detected AD without an US correlate in our series of 45 cases was 6/45 (13.3%). In the absence of an US correlate, the PPV of AD is lower than that mentioned in prior literature but exceeds the 2% threshold to justify DBT-guided biopsy.Source
J Clin Imaging Sci. 2019 Nov 18;9:53. doi: 10.25259/JCIS_134_2019. eCollection 2019. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.25259/JCIS_134_2019Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48399PubMed ID
31819830Related Resources
Rights
© 2019 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.Distribution License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.25259/JCIS_134_2019
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2019 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.