Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKuhn, Anna L.
dc.contributor.authorde Macedo Rodrigues, Katyucia
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Jasmeet
dc.contributor.authorMassari, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorPuri, Ajit S.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:49.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:20:55Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:20:55Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-08
dc.date.submitted2020-01-13
dc.identifier.citation<p>Kühn AL, de Macedo Rodrigues K, Singh J, Massari F, Puri AS. Distal radial access in the anatomical snuffbox for neurointerventions: a feasibility, safety, and proof-of-concept study. <em>J Neurointerv Surg</em>. 2020 Jan 8;neurintsurg-2019-015604. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015604. [Epub ahead of print]. PMID: 31915209.</p>
dc.identifier.issn1759-8486
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015604
dc.identifier.pmid31915209
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48408
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To report the first use of distal radial artery (dRA) access for a variety of neurointerventions and to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of this approach. METHODS: A retrospective review of our prospective neurointerventional database of endovascular interventions was conducted and, between May and October 2019, all patients in whom the intervention was performed via dRA in the anatomical snuffbox were identified. Patient demographics, clinical information, procedural and radiographic data were collected. RESULTS: 48 patients with a mean age of 64.4 years (range 35-84 years) were included. 27 patients were female. dRA access was achieved in all cases. Conversion to femoral access was required in five cases (10.4%) due to tortuous vessel anatomy and limited support of the catheters in the aortic arch. Interventions performed included aneurysm treatment (with flow diverters, Woven EndoBridge device placement, coiling or stent-assisted coiling), arteriovenous malformation and dural arteriovenous fistula embolization, carotid artery stentings, stroke thrombectomy, thrombolysis for central retinal artery occlusion, intracranial stenting, middle meningeal artery embolization, vasospasm treatment, and spinal angiography with embolization. Radial artery vasospasm was seen in two cases and successfully treated with antispasmolytic medication. No symptomatic radial artery occlusion or ischemic event was observed. CONCLUSION: dRA access is safe and effective for a variety of neurointerventions. Our preliminary experience with this approach is very promising and shows high patient satisfaction.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915209" target="_blank" title="Link to article in PubMed">Link to article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015604
dc.subjectaneurysm
dc.subjectangiography
dc.subjectflow diverter
dc.subjectintervention
dc.subjectCardiovascular Diseases
dc.subjectNeurology
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleDistal radial access in the anatomical snuffbox for neurointerventions: a feasibility, safety, and proof-of-concept study
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of Neurointerventional Surgery
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/radiology_pubs/517
dc.identifier.contextkey16198217
html.description.abstract<p>PURPOSE: To report the first use of distal radial artery (dRA) access for a variety of neurointerventions and to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of this approach.</p> <p>METHODS: A retrospective review of our prospective neurointerventional database of endovascular interventions was conducted and, between May and October 2019, all patients in whom the intervention was performed via dRA in the anatomical snuffbox were identified. Patient demographics, clinical information, procedural and radiographic data were collected.</p> <p>RESULTS: 48 patients with a mean age of 64.4 years (range 35-84 years) were included. 27 patients were female. dRA access was achieved in all cases. Conversion to femoral access was required in five cases (10.4%) due to tortuous vessel anatomy and limited support of the catheters in the aortic arch. Interventions performed included aneurysm treatment (with flow diverters, Woven EndoBridge device placement, coiling or stent-assisted coiling), arteriovenous malformation and dural arteriovenous fistula embolization, carotid artery stentings, stroke thrombectomy, thrombolysis for central retinal artery occlusion, intracranial stenting, middle meningeal artery embolization, vasospasm treatment, and spinal angiography with embolization. Radial artery vasospasm was seen in two cases and successfully treated with antispasmolytic medication. No symptomatic radial artery occlusion or ischemic event was observed.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: dRA access is safe and effective for a variety of neurointerventions. Our preliminary experience with this approach is very promising and shows high patient satisfaction.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathradiology_pubs/517
dc.contributor.departmentDivision of Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record