We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until December 11, 2024. New submissions or changes to existing items will not be allowed during this period. All content already published will remain publicly available for searching and downloading. Updates will be posted in the Website Upgrade 2024 FAQ in the sidebar Help menu. Reach out to escholarship@umassmed.edu with any questions.
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Radiology, Abdominal ImagingDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2021-11-15Keywords
AUCAcid reflux
Appropriate Use Criteria
Appropriateness Criteria
CT
Esophagitis
Fluoroscopy
Gastric cancer
Hiatal hernia
Radiology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Epigastric pain can have multiple etiologies including myocardial infarction, pancreatitis, acute aortic syndromes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, duodenal ulcer disease, gastric cancer, and hiatal hernia. This document focuses on the scenarios in which epigastric pain is accompanied by symptoms such as heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, and hematemesis, which raise suspicion for gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, duodenal ulcer disease, gastric cancer, or hiatal hernia. Although endoscopy may be the test of choice for diagnosing these entities, patients may present with nonspecific or overlapping symptoms, necessitating the use of imaging prior to or instead of endoscopy. The utility of fluoroscopic imaging, CT, MRI, and FDG-PET for these indications are discussed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.Source
Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging, Vij A, Zaheer A, Kamel IR, Porter KK, Arif-Tiwari H, Bashir MR, Fung A, Goldstein A, Herr KD, Kamaya A, Kobi M, Landler MP, Russo GK, Thakrar KH, Turturro MA, Wahab SA, Wardrop RM 3rd, Wright CL, Yang X, Carucci LR. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Epigastric Pain. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Nov;18(11S):S330-S339. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.006. PMID: 34794592. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.006Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48568PubMed ID
34794592Notes
Full author list omitted for brevity. For the full list of authors, see article.
Related Resources
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.006