Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVij, Abhinav
dc.contributor.authorGoldstein, Alan J.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:50.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:21:38Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:21:38Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-15
dc.date.submitted2022-01-12
dc.identifier.citation<p>Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging, Vij A, Zaheer A, Kamel IR, Porter KK, Arif-Tiwari H, Bashir MR, Fung A, Goldstein A, Herr KD, Kamaya A, Kobi M, Landler MP, Russo GK, Thakrar KH, Turturro MA, Wahab SA, Wardrop RM 3rd, Wright CL, Yang X, Carucci LR. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Epigastric Pain. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Nov;18(11S):S330-S339. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.006. PMID: 34794592. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.006">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1546-1440 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.006
dc.identifier.pmid34794592
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48568
dc.description<p>Full author list omitted for brevity. For the full list of authors, see article.</p>
dc.description.abstractEpigastric pain can have multiple etiologies including myocardial infarction, pancreatitis, acute aortic syndromes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, duodenal ulcer disease, gastric cancer, and hiatal hernia. This document focuses on the scenarios in which epigastric pain is accompanied by symptoms such as heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, and hematemesis, which raise suspicion for gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, duodenal ulcer disease, gastric cancer, or hiatal hernia. Although endoscopy may be the test of choice for diagnosing these entities, patients may present with nonspecific or overlapping symptoms, necessitating the use of imaging prior to or instead of endoscopy. The utility of fluoroscopic imaging, CT, MRI, and FDG-PET for these indications are discussed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=34794592&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.006
dc.subjectAUC
dc.subjectAcid reflux
dc.subjectAppropriate Use Criteria
dc.subjectAppropriateness Criteria
dc.subjectCT
dc.subjectEsophagitis
dc.subjectFluoroscopy
dc.subjectGastric cancer
dc.subjectHiatal hernia
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.titleACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) Epigastric Pain
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
dc.source.volume18
dc.source.issue11S
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/radiology_pubs/666
dc.identifier.contextkey27301971
html.description.abstract<p>Epigastric pain can have multiple etiologies including myocardial infarction, pancreatitis, acute aortic syndromes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, duodenal ulcer disease, gastric cancer, and hiatal hernia. This document focuses on the scenarios in which epigastric pain is accompanied by symptoms such as heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, and hematemesis, which raise suspicion for gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, duodenal ulcer disease, gastric cancer, or hiatal hernia. Although endoscopy may be the test of choice for diagnosing these entities, patients may present with nonspecific or overlapping symptoms, necessitating the use of imaging prior to or instead of endoscopy. The utility of fluoroscopic imaging, CT, MRI, and FDG-PET for these indications are discussed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathradiology_pubs/666
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging
dc.source.pagesS330-S339


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record