ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) Epigastric Pain
dc.contributor.author | Vij, Abhinav | |
dc.contributor.author | Goldstein, Alan J. | |
dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:10:50.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T17:21:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T17:21:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-11-15 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2022-01-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | <p>Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging, Vij A, Zaheer A, Kamel IR, Porter KK, Arif-Tiwari H, Bashir MR, Fung A, Goldstein A, Herr KD, Kamaya A, Kobi M, Landler MP, Russo GK, Thakrar KH, Turturro MA, Wahab SA, Wardrop RM 3rd, Wright CL, Yang X, Carucci LR. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Epigastric Pain. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Nov;18(11S):S330-S339. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.006. PMID: 34794592. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.006">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p> | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1546-1440 (Linking) | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.006 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 34794592 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48568 | |
dc.description | <p>Full author list omitted for brevity. For the full list of authors, see article.</p> | |
dc.description.abstract | Epigastric pain can have multiple etiologies including myocardial infarction, pancreatitis, acute aortic syndromes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, duodenal ulcer disease, gastric cancer, and hiatal hernia. This document focuses on the scenarios in which epigastric pain is accompanied by symptoms such as heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, and hematemesis, which raise suspicion for gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, duodenal ulcer disease, gastric cancer, or hiatal hernia. Although endoscopy may be the test of choice for diagnosing these entities, patients may present with nonspecific or overlapping symptoms, necessitating the use of imaging prior to or instead of endoscopy. The utility of fluoroscopic imaging, CT, MRI, and FDG-PET for these indications are discussed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.relation | <p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=34794592&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p> | |
dc.relation.url | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.006 | |
dc.subject | AUC | |
dc.subject | Acid reflux | |
dc.subject | Appropriate Use Criteria | |
dc.subject | Appropriateness Criteria | |
dc.subject | CT | |
dc.subject | Esophagitis | |
dc.subject | Fluoroscopy | |
dc.subject | Gastric cancer | |
dc.subject | Hiatal hernia | |
dc.subject | Radiology | |
dc.title | ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) Epigastric Pain | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR | |
dc.source.volume | 18 | |
dc.source.issue | 11S | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/radiology_pubs/666 | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 27301971 | |
html.description.abstract | <p>Epigastric pain can have multiple etiologies including myocardial infarction, pancreatitis, acute aortic syndromes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, duodenal ulcer disease, gastric cancer, and hiatal hernia. This document focuses on the scenarios in which epigastric pain is accompanied by symptoms such as heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, and hematemesis, which raise suspicion for gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, duodenal ulcer disease, gastric cancer, or hiatal hernia. Although endoscopy may be the test of choice for diagnosing these entities, patients may present with nonspecific or overlapping symptoms, necessitating the use of imaging prior to or instead of endoscopy. The utility of fluoroscopic imaging, CT, MRI, and FDG-PET for these indications are discussed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.</p> | |
dc.identifier.submissionpath | radiology_pubs/666 | |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging | |
dc.source.pages | S330-S339 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Radiology Publications [1271]