Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
UMass Chan Affiliations
RadiologyDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2021-12-08Keywords
Acute ischemic strokeAnimal model
Clot
In-vitro model
Thrombectomy device
Biomechanics and Biotransport
Cardiovascular Diseases
Nervous System Diseases
Neurology
Radiology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Mechanical thrombectomy to treat large vessel occlusions (LVO) causing a stroke is one of the most effective treatments in medicine, with a number needed to treat to improve clinical outcomes as low as 2.6. As the name implies, it is a mechanical solution to a blocked artery and modeling these mechanics preclinically for device design, regulatory clearance and high-fidelity physician training made clinical applications possible. In vitro simulation of LVO is extensively used to characterize device performance in representative vascular anatomies with physiologically accurate hemodynamics. Embolus analogues, validated against clots extracted from patients, provide a realistic simulated use experience. In vitro experimentation produces quantitative results such as particle analysis of distal emboli generated during the procedure, as well as pressure and flow throughout the experiment. Animal modeling, used mostly for regulatory review, allows estimation of device safety. Other than one recent development, nearly all animal modeling does not incorporate the desired target organ, the brain, but rather is performed in the extracranial circulation. Computational modeling of the procedure remains at the earliest stages but represents an enormous opportunity to rapidly characterize and iterate new thrombectomy concepts as well as optimize procedure workflow. No preclinical model is a perfect surrogate; however, models available can answer important questions during device development and have to date been successful in delivering efficacious and safe devices producing excellent clinical outcomes. This review reflects on the developments of preclinical modeling of mechanical thrombectomy with particular focus on clinical translation, as well as articulate existing gaps requiring additional research.Source
Anagnostakou V, Epshtein M, Kühn AL, King RM, Puri A, Gounis MJ. Preclinical modeling of mechanical thrombectomy. J Biomech. 2022 Jan;130:110894. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110894. Epub 2021 Dec 8. PMID: 34915309. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110894Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48570PubMed ID
34915309Related Resources
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110894