Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKuhn, Anna L.
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Jasmeet
dc.contributor.authorMassari, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorde Macedo Rodrigues, Katyucia
dc.contributor.authorGounis, Matthew J
dc.contributor.authorPuri, Ajit S
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:50.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:21:56Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:21:56Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-22
dc.date.submitted2022-05-13
dc.identifier.citation<p>Kühn AL, Singh J, Massari F, de Macedo Rodrigues K, Gounis MJ, Puri AS. Flow Diverter Reconstruction of Internal Carotid Artery (Loop) Dissections with or without Associated Pseudoaneurysms. World Neurosurg. 2022 Feb 22:S1878-8750(22)00220-0. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.073. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35217230. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.073">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1878-8750 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.073
dc.identifier.pmid35217230
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48636
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Endovascular treatment of cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) loop dissections in acute stroke interventions can be challenging. Flow diverters can effectively reconstruct vessel loops and treat the injured vessel and provide a safe conduit for intracranial catheterization. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our neurointerventional database and identified all patients with ICA loop dissections treated with flow diverters in the acute setting between August 2016 and September 2020. Patient demographics, procedural data, imaging follow-up results, and clinical outcome information were collected. RESULTS: Seven patients with a mean age of 62 years (range: 43-85 years) who underwent reconstruction of an ICA (loop) dissection with flow diverters were included. Four ICA dissections were treated with the Surpass Streamline flow diverter and 3 with the Pipeline embolization device. All cases were technically successful. All stroke cases achieved intracranial flow > /=thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2B. Observed intracranial hemorrhages were all asymptomatic. All cases showed patent flow diverter(s) with or without (carotid) stent(s) on follow-up imaging. Semielectively treated patients did not show a change from baseline modified Rankin scale related to the procedure. Patients with acute stroke had a modified Rankin scale < /=2 in 4 of 5 cases (80%) at 3 months. Two patients died due to medical issues unrelated to the procedures. No patient showed new or recurrent symptoms. CONCLUSION: Use of flow diverters, in some cases in conjunction with (carotid) stents, is an effective treatment option for cervical carotid artery (loop) dissections.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=35217230&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.073
dc.subjectCarotid stent
dc.subjectDissection
dc.subjectFlow diverter
dc.subjectInternal carotid artery
dc.subjectPseudoaneurysm
dc.subjectStroke
dc.subjectCardiovascular Diseases
dc.subjectNervous System Diseases
dc.subjectNeurology
dc.subjectNeurosurgery
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.titleFlow Diverter Reconstruction of Internal Carotid Artery (Loop) Dissections with or without Associated Pseudoaneurysms
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleWorld neurosurgery
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/radiology_pubs/699
dc.identifier.contextkey29165057
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: Endovascular treatment of cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) loop dissections in acute stroke interventions can be challenging. Flow diverters can effectively reconstruct vessel loops and treat the injured vessel and provide a safe conduit for intracranial catheterization.</p> <p>METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our neurointerventional database and identified all patients with ICA loop dissections treated with flow diverters in the acute setting between August 2016 and September 2020. Patient demographics, procedural data, imaging follow-up results, and clinical outcome information were collected.</p> <p>RESULTS: Seven patients with a mean age of 62 years (range: 43-85 years) who underwent reconstruction of an ICA (loop) dissection with flow diverters were included. Four ICA dissections were treated with the Surpass Streamline flow diverter and 3 with the Pipeline embolization device. All cases were technically successful. All stroke cases achieved intracranial flow > /=thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2B. Observed intracranial hemorrhages were all asymptomatic. All cases showed patent flow diverter(s) with or without (carotid) stent(s) on follow-up imaging. Semielectively treated patients did not show a change from baseline modified Rankin scale related to the procedure. Patients with acute stroke had a modified Rankin scale < /=2 in 4 of 5 cases (80%) at 3 months. Two patients died due to medical issues unrelated to the procedures. No patient showed new or recurrent symptoms.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: Use of flow diverters, in some cases in conjunction with (carotid) stents, is an effective treatment option for cervical carotid artery (loop) dissections.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathradiology_pubs/699
dc.contributor.departmentRadiology


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record