Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAdeeb, Nimer
dc.contributor.authorKuhn, Anna L.
dc.contributor.authorPuri, Ajit S.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:50.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:21:58Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:21:58Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-28
dc.date.submitted2022-07-15
dc.identifier.citation<p>Adeeb N, Dibas M, Diestro JDB, Phan K, Cuellar-Saenz HH, Sweid A, Lay SV, Guenego A, Aslan A, Renieri L, Sundararajan SH, Saliou G, Möhlenbruch M, Regenhardt RW, Vranic JE, Lylyk I, Foreman PM, Vachhani JA, Župančić V, Hafeez MU, Rutledge C, Waqas M, Tutino VM, Rabinov JD, Ren Y, Schirmer CM, Piano M, Kuhn AL, Michelozzi C, Elens S, Starke RM, Hassan A, Salehani A, Brehm A, MohammedAli M, Jones J, Psychogios M, Spears J, Lubicz B, Panni P, Puri AS, Pero G, Griessenauer CJ, Asadi H, Siddiqui A, Ducruet A, Albuquerque FC, Du R, Kan P, Kalousek V, Lylyk P, Stapleton CJ, Boddu S, Knopman J, Aziz-Sultan MA, Limbucci N, Jabbour P, Cognard C, Patel AB, Dmytriw AA. Comparing treatment outcomes of various intracranial bifurcation aneurysms locations using the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device. J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Apr 28:neurintsurg-2022-018694. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018694. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35483912. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018694">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1759-8478 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018694
dc.identifier.pmid35483912
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48645
dc.description<p>Full author list omitted for brevity. For the full list of authors, see article.</p>
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device has Food and Drug Administration approval for treatment of wide-necked intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. The WEB device has been shown to result in adequate occlusion in bifurcation aneurysms overall, but its usefulness in the individual bifurcation locations has been evaluated separately only in few case series, which were limited by small sample sizes. OBJECTIVE: To compare angiographic and clinical outcomes after treatment of bifurcation aneurysms at various locations, including anterior communicating artery (AComA), anterior cerebral artery (ACA) bifurcation distal to AComA, basilar tip, internal carotid artery (ICA) bifurcation, and middle cerebral artery (MCA) bifurcation aneurysms using the WEB device. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted at 22 academic institutions worldwide to compare treatment outcomes of patients with intracranial bifurcation aneurysms using the WEB device. Data include patient and aneurysm characteristics, procedural details, angiographic and functional outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 572 aneurysms were included. MCA (36%), AComA (35.7%), and basilar tip (18.9%) aneurysms were most common. The rate of adequate aneurysm occlusion was significantly higher for basilar tip (91.6%) and ICA bifurcation (96.7%) aneurysms and lower for ACA bifurcation (71.4%) and AComA (80.6%) aneurysms (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the most extensive study to date that compares the treatment of different intracranial bifurcation aneurysms using the WEB device. Basilar tip and ICA bifurcation aneurysms showed significantly higher rates of aneurysm occlusion than other locations.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=35483912&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018694
dc.subjectAneurysm
dc.subjectCardiovascular Diseases
dc.subjectNeurology
dc.subjectNeurosurgery
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.titleComparing treatment outcomes of various intracranial bifurcation aneurysms locations using the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of neurointerventional surgery
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/radiology_pubs/708
dc.identifier.contextkey30234296
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device has Food and Drug Administration approval for treatment of wide-necked intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. The WEB device has been shown to result in adequate occlusion in bifurcation aneurysms overall, but its usefulness in the individual bifurcation locations has been evaluated separately only in few case series, which were limited by small sample sizes.</p> <p>OBJECTIVE: To compare angiographic and clinical outcomes after treatment of bifurcation aneurysms at various locations, including anterior communicating artery (AComA), anterior cerebral artery (ACA) bifurcation distal to AComA, basilar tip, internal carotid artery (ICA) bifurcation, and middle cerebral artery (MCA) bifurcation aneurysms using the WEB device.</p> <p>METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted at 22 academic institutions worldwide to compare treatment outcomes of patients with intracranial bifurcation aneurysms using the WEB device. Data include patient and aneurysm characteristics, procedural details, angiographic and functional outcomes, and complications.</p> <p>RESULTS: A total of 572 aneurysms were included. MCA (36%), AComA (35.7%), and basilar tip (18.9%) aneurysms were most common. The rate of adequate aneurysm occlusion was significantly higher for basilar tip (91.6%) and ICA bifurcation (96.7%) aneurysms and lower for ACA bifurcation (71.4%) and AComA (80.6%) aneurysms (p=0.04).</p> <p>CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the most extensive study to date that compares the treatment of different intracranial bifurcation aneurysms using the WEB device. Basilar tip and ICA bifurcation aneurysms showed significantly higher rates of aneurysm occlusion than other locations.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathradiology_pubs/708
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiology


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record