Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCollier, Deborah S.
dc.contributor.authorGrant, Richard W.
dc.contributor.authorEstey, Greg
dc.contributor.authorSurrao, Dominic
dc.contributor.authorChueh, Henry C.
dc.contributor.authorKay, Jonathan
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:51.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:22:31Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:22:31Z
dc.date.issued2009-04-15
dc.date.submitted2015-04-17
dc.identifier.citationArthritis Rheum. 2009 Apr 15;61(4):495-500. doi: 10.1002/art.24335. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.24335">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0004-3591 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/art.24335
dc.identifier.pmid19333984
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48764
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To assess physicians' concordance with Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) categories calculated by an electronic medical record (EMR)-embedded disease activity calculator, as well as attitudes toward this application. METHODS: Fifteen rheumatologists used the EMR-embedded disease activity calculator to predict a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) DAS28 disease activity category at the time of each clinical encounter. RESULTS: Physician-predicted DAS28 disease activity categories ranged from high ( > 5.1, 15% of cohort, 66 of 429 patient visits) to moderate ( > 3.2-5.1, 21% of cohort, 90 of 429 patient visits) to low (2.6-3.2, 29% of cohort, 123 of 429 patient visits) to remission ( < 2.6, 35% of cohort, 150 of 429 patient visits). Overall concordance between calculated DAS28 results and physician-predicted RA disease activity was 64%. Using either the physician-predicted or the calculated DAS28 category as the gold standard, accuracy was greatest for patients in remission (75% and 88% accuracy, respectively) and those with high disease activity (68% and 79% accuracy, respectively), and less for patients with moderate (48% and 62% accuracy, respectively) or low disease activity (62% and 31% accuracy, respectively). CONCLUSION: Accurate physician prediction of DAS28 remission and high disease activity categories, even without immediate availability of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate or the C-reactive protein level at the time of the visit, may be used to guide quantitatively driven outpatient RA management.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=19333984&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.24335
dc.subjectArthritis, Rheumatoid
dc.subject*Attitude of Health Personnel
dc.subjectCohort Studies
dc.subjectDisability Evaluation
dc.subjectDisease Progression
dc.subjectHealth Care Surveys
dc.subjectHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subject*Medical Records Systems, Computerized
dc.subjectOutcome Assessment (Health Care)
dc.subjectPredictive Value of Tests
dc.subjectRheumatology
dc.subject*Severity of Illness Index
dc.subject*Software
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal Diseases
dc.subjectRheumatology
dc.subjectSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases
dc.titlePhysician ability to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity using an electronic medical record-based disease activity calculator
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleArthritis and rheumatism
dc.source.volume61
dc.source.issue4
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/rheumatology_pubs/89
dc.identifier.contextkey7002913
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: To assess physicians' concordance with Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) categories calculated by an electronic medical record (EMR)-embedded disease activity calculator, as well as attitudes toward this application.</p> <p>METHODS: Fifteen rheumatologists used the EMR-embedded disease activity calculator to predict a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) DAS28 disease activity category at the time of each clinical encounter.</p> <p>RESULTS: Physician-predicted DAS28 disease activity categories ranged from high ( > 5.1, 15% of cohort, 66 of 429 patient visits) to moderate ( > 3.2-5.1, 21% of cohort, 90 of 429 patient visits) to low (2.6-3.2, 29% of cohort, 123 of 429 patient visits) to remission ( < 2.6, 35% of cohort, 150 of 429 patient visits). Overall concordance between calculated DAS28 results and physician-predicted RA disease activity was 64%. Using either the physician-predicted or the calculated DAS28 category as the gold standard, accuracy was greatest for patients in remission (75% and 88% accuracy, respectively) and those with high disease activity (68% and 79% accuracy, respectively), and less for patients with moderate (48% and 62% accuracy, respectively) or low disease activity (62% and 31% accuracy, respectively).</p> <p>CONCLUSION: Accurate physician prediction of DAS28 remission and high disease activity categories, even without immediate availability of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate or the C-reactive protein level at the time of the visit, may be used to guide quantitatively driven outpatient RA management.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathrheumatology_pubs/89
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology
dc.source.pages495-500


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record