The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Phase 2 methodological report
Authors
Neogi, TuhinaAletaha, Daniel
Silman, Alan J.
Naden, Raymond L.
Felson, David T.
Aggarwal, Rohit
Bingham, Clifton O. III
Birnbaum, Neal S.
Burmester, Gerd R.
Bykerk, Vivian P.
Cohen, Marc D.
Combe, Bernard
Costenbader, Karen H.
Dougados, Maxime
Emery, Paul
Ferraccioli, Gianfranco
Hazes, Johanna M. W.
Hobbs, Kathryn
Huizinga, Tom W. J.
Kavanaugh, Arthur
Kay, Jonathan
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Medicine, Division of RheumatologyDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2010-09-01Keywords
Acute-Phase ReactionArthritis, Rheumatoid
Clinical Chemistry Tests
Consensus
Decision Making, Computer-Assisted
Decision Support Techniques
Europe
Evidence-Based Medicine
Female
Humans
International Cooperation
Male
North America
Rheumatology
Societies, Medical
Synovitis
Terminology as Topic
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Rheumatology
Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism have developed new classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of Phase 2 of the development process was to achieve expert consensus on the clinical and laboratory variables that should contribute to the final criteria set. METHODS: Twenty-four expert RA clinicians (12 from Europe and 12 from North America) participated in Phase 2. A consensus-based decision analysis approach was used to identify factors (and their relative weights) that influence the probability of "developing RA," complemented by data from the Phase 1 study. Patient case scenarios were used to identify and reach consensus on factors important in determining the probability of RA development. Decision analytic software was used to derive the relative weights for each of the factors and their categories, using choice-based conjoint analysis. RESULTS: The expert panel agreed that the new classification criteria should be applied to individuals with undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis in whom at least 1 joint is deemed by an expert assessor to be swollen, indicating definite synovitis. In this clinical setting, they identified 4 additional criteria as being important: number of joints involved and site of involvement, serologic abnormality, acute-phase response, and duration of symptoms in the involved joints. These criteria were consistent with those identified in the Phase 1 data-driven approach. CONCLUSION: The consensus-based, decision analysis approach used in Phase 2 complemented the Phase 1 efforts. The 4 criteria and their relative weights form the basis of the final criteria set.Source
Neogi T, Aletaha D, Silman AJ, Naden RL, Felson DT, Aggarwal R, Bingham CO 3rd, Birnbaum NS, Burmester GR, Bykerk VP, Cohen MD, Combe B, Costenbader KH, Dougados M, Emery P, Ferraccioli G, Hazes JM, Hobbs K, Huizinga TW, Kavanaugh A, Kay J, Khanna D, Kvien TK, Laing T, Liao K, Mease P, Ménard HA, Moreland LW, Nair R, Pincus T, Ringold S, Smolen JS, Stanislawska-Biernat E, Symmons D, Tak PP, Upchurch KS, Vencovský J, Wolfe F, Hawker G; American College of Rheumatology; European League Against Rheumatism. The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Phase 2 methodological report. Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Sep;62(9):2582-91. doi: 10.1002/art.27580. PubMed PMID: 20872596; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3077961. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1002/art.27580Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48771PubMed ID
20872596Notes
Full author list omitted for brevity. For the full list of authors, see article.
Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/art.27580