Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThorsen, Rasmus O.
dc.contributor.authorHulleman, Christiaan N.
dc.contributor.authorHammer, Mathias
dc.contributor.authorGrunwald, David
dc.contributor.authorStallinga, Sjoerd
dc.contributor.authorRieger, Bernd
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:52.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:22:56Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:22:56Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-01
dc.date.submitted2019-09-18
dc.identifier.citation<p>Nat Methods. 2018 Dec;15(12):989-990. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0227-4. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0227-4">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1548-7091 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41592-018-0227-4
dc.identifier.pmid30504865
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48849
dc.description.abstractRecently, Franke et al.introduced a way to estimate the axial position of single molecules (temporal radial-aperture-based intensity estimation (TRABI)). To this end, they compared the detected photon count from a TRABI estimation to the estimated count from Gaussian point-spread function (PSF) fitting to the data. Empirically they found that the photometric ratio is ~0.7–0.8 at points close to focus and decreases as the distance from the focal plane increases. Here we explain this reported but unexplained discrepancy and, furthermore, show that the photometric ratio as an indicator for axial position is susceptible even to typical optical aberrations.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=30504865&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588158/
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Biophysics, and Structural Biology
dc.subjectBioimaging and Biomedical Optics
dc.titleImpact of optical aberrations on axial position determination by photometry
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleNature methods
dc.source.volume15
dc.source.issue12
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/rti_pubs/58
dc.identifier.contextkey15358658
html.description.abstract<p>Recently, Franke et al.introduced a way to estimate the axial position of single molecules (temporal radial-aperture-based intensity estimation (TRABI)). To this end, they compared the detected photon count from a TRABI estimation to the estimated count from Gaussian point-spread function (PSF) fitting to the data. Empirically they found that the photometric ratio is ~0.7–0.8 at points close to focus and decreases as the distance from the focal plane increases. Here we explain this reported but unexplained discrepancy and, furthermore, show that the photometric ratio as an indicator for axial position is susceptible even to typical optical aberrations.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathrti_pubs/58
dc.contributor.departmentRNA Therapeutics Institute
dc.source.pages989-990


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record