Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDebert, Paula
dc.contributor.authorMatos, Maria Amelia
dc.contributor.authorMcIlvane, William J.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:53.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:23:20Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:23:20Z
dc.date.issued2007-01-10
dc.date.submitted2011-07-08
dc.identifier.citationJ Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Jan;87(1):89-96.
dc.identifier.issn0022-5002 (Linking)
dc.identifier.pmid17345953
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48934
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate whether emergent conditional relations could be established with a go/no-go procedure using compound abstract stimuli. The procedure was conducted with 6 adult humans. During training, responses emitted in the presence of certain stimulus compounds (A1B1, A2B2, A3B3, B1C1, B2C2, and B3C3) were followed by reinforcing consequences (points); responses emitted in the presence of other compounds (A1B2, A1B3, A2B1, A2B3, A3B1, A3B2, B1C2, B1C3, B2C1, B2C3, B3C1 and B3C2) were not (i.e., extinction). During subsequent tests of emergent relations, new configurations (BA, CB, AC, and CA relations) were presented, formed by the recombination of training stimuli and structurally resembling tests usually employed in stimulus equivalence studies. Results showed that all 6 participants displayed immediate emergence of relations consistent with symmetry. Four participants exhibited emergent relations consistent with both transitivity and equivalence. These results indicate that a go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli can establish emergent conditional relations, thus providing a procedural alternative to the matching-to-sample procedures commonly used in studies of stimulus equivalence.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=17345953&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1790877/pdf/jeab-87-01-89.pdf
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subject*Association Learning
dc.subject*Attention
dc.subject*Discrimination Learning
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subject*Inhibition (Psychology)
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectOrientation
dc.subjectProblem Solving
dc.subject*Psychomotor Performance
dc.subjectReinforcement Schedule
dc.subjectMental and Social Health
dc.subjectNeuroscience and Neurobiology
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Psychology
dc.titleConditional relations with compound abstract stimuli using a go/no-go procedure
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior
dc.source.volume87
dc.source.issue1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/shriver_pp/14
dc.identifier.contextkey2092317
html.description.abstract<p>The aim of this study was to evaluate whether emergent conditional relations could be established with a go/no-go procedure using compound abstract stimuli. The procedure was conducted with 6 adult humans. During training, responses emitted in the presence of certain stimulus compounds (A1B1, A2B2, A3B3, B1C1, B2C2, and B3C3) were followed by reinforcing consequences (points); responses emitted in the presence of other compounds (A1B2, A1B3, A2B1, A2B3, A3B1, A3B2, B1C2, B1C3, B2C1, B2C3, B3C1 and B3C2) were not (i.e., extinction). During subsequent tests of emergent relations, new configurations (BA, CB, AC, and CA relations) were presented, formed by the recombination of training stimuli and structurally resembling tests usually employed in stimulus equivalence studies. Results showed that all 6 participants displayed immediate emergence of relations consistent with symmetry. Four participants exhibited emergent relations consistent with both transitivity and equivalence. These results indicate that a go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli can establish emergent conditional relations, thus providing a procedural alternative to the matching-to-sample procedures commonly used in studies of stimulus equivalence.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathshriver_pp/14
dc.contributor.departmentShriver Center
dc.source.pages89-96


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record