Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDube, William V.
dc.contributor.authorMcIlvane, William J.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:53.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:23:20Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:23:20Z
dc.date.issued2002-02-21
dc.date.submitted2011-07-08
dc.identifier.citationAm J Ment Retard. 2002 Mar;107(2):136-45. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017%282002%29107%3C0136:QAOSTR%3E2.0.CO;2">Link to article on publisher's website</a>
dc.identifier.issn0895-8017 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1352/0895-8017%282002%29107%3C0136:QAOSTR%3E2.0.CO;2
dc.identifier.pmid11853531
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48937
dc.description.abstractSensitivity to differences in reinforcement contingencies was examined in 6 individuals with mental retardation. A concurrent operants procedure was implemented in the context of a computer game. Participants selected two different types of animated figures displayed concurrently in the left and right portions of a touchscreen monitor. Over a series of conditions, the relative rates or magnitudes of reinforcers following selections of the two options were changed in ratios of 5:1, 3:1, 1:1, 1:3, and 1:5. Sensitivity was quantified by application of the generalized matching equation. Results included individual differences in sensitivity and differential sensitivity to rate and magnitude variation. The results suggest that comprehensive assessments of potential reinforcers may benefit from including tests of delivery parameters.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=11853531&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017%282002%29107%3C0136%3AQAOSTR%3E2.0.CO%3B2
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMental Retardation
dc.subject*Reinforcement (Psychology)
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificity
dc.subjectSoftware
dc.subjectMental and Social Health
dc.subjectNeuroscience and Neurobiology
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Psychology
dc.titleQuantitative assessments of sensitivity to reinforcement contingencies in mental retardation
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleAmerican journal of mental retardation : AJMR
dc.source.volume107
dc.source.issue2
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/shriver_pp/18
dc.identifier.contextkey2092322
html.description.abstract<p>Sensitivity to differences in reinforcement contingencies was examined in 6 individuals with mental retardation. A concurrent operants procedure was implemented in the context of a computer game. Participants selected two different types of animated figures displayed concurrently in the left and right portions of a touchscreen monitor. Over a series of conditions, the relative rates or magnitudes of reinforcers following selections of the two options were changed in ratios of 5:1, 3:1, 1:1, 1:3, and 1:5. Sensitivity was quantified by application of the generalized matching equation. Results included individual differences in sensitivity and differential sensitivity to rate and magnitude variation. The results suggest that comprehensive assessments of potential reinforcers may benefit from including tests of delivery parameters.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathshriver_pp/18
dc.contributor.departmentShriver Center
dc.source.pages136-45


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record