• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Staff Research and Publications
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Researcher Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Staff Research and Publications
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Researcher Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of eScholarship@UMassChanCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywordsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywords

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutSubmission GuidelinesData Deposit PolicySearchingTerms of UseWebsite Migration FAQ

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Observing behavior and atypically restricted stimulus control

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Dube, William V.
    Dickson, Chata A.
    Balsamo, Lyn M.
    O'Donnell, Kristin Lombard
    Tomanari, Gerson Y.
    Farren, Kevin M.
    Wheeler, Emily E.
    McIlvane, William J.
    UMass Chan Affiliations
    Shriver Center
    Document Type
    Journal Article
    Publication Date
    2010-11-05
    Keywords
    Discrimination Learning
    Developmental Disabilities
    Autistic Disorder
    Mental Retardation
    Child Development Disorders, Pervasive
    Mental and Social Health
    Neuroscience and Neurobiology
    Psychiatry and Psychology
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Link to Full Text
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2972782/pdf/jeab-94-03-297.pdf
    Abstract
    Restricted stimulus control refers to discrimination learning with atypical limitations in the range of controlling stimuli or stimulus features. In the study reported here, 4 normally capable individuals and 10 individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) performed two-sample delayed matching to sample. Sample-stimulus observing was recorded with an eye-tracking apparatus. High accuracy scores indicated stimulus control by both sample stimuli for the 4 nondisabled participants and 4 participants with ID, and eye tracking data showed reliable observing of all stimuli. Intermediate accuracy scores indicated restricted stimulus control for the remaining 6 participants. Their eye-tracking data showed that errors were related to failures to observe sample stimuli and relatively brief observing durations. Five of these participants were then given interventions designed to improve observing behavior. For 4 participants, the interventions resulted initially in elimination of observing failures, increased observing durations, and increased accuracy. For 2 of these participants, contingencies sufficient to maintain adequate observing were not always sufficient to maintain high accuracy; subsequent procedure modifications restored it, however. For the 5th participant, initial improvements in observing were not accompanied by improved accuracy, an apparent instance of observing without attending; accuracy improved only after an additional intervention that imposed contingencies on observing behavior. Thus, interventions that control observing behavior seem necessary but may not always be sufficient for the remediation of restricted stimulus control.
    Source
    J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Nov;94(3):297-313. Link to article on publisher's site
    DOI
    10.1901/jeab.2010.94-297
    Permanent Link to this Item
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48950
    PubMed ID
    21541173
    Related Resources
    Link to Article in PubMed
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1901/jeab.2010.94-297
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UMass Chan Faculty and Researcher Publications

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Lamar Soutter Library, UMass Chan Medical School | 55 Lake Avenue North | Worcester, MA 01655 USA
    Quick Guide | escholarship@umassmed.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.