Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcIlvane, William J.
dc.contributor.authorDube, William V.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:53.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:23:27Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:23:27Z
dc.date.issued2003-09-01
dc.date.submitted2011-07-26
dc.identifier.citationMcIlvane, W. J., & Dube, W. V. (2003). Stimulus control topography coherence theory: Foundations and extensions. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 195-213.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48962
dc.description.abstractStimulus control topography refers to qualitative differences among members of a functional stimulus class. Stimulus control topography coherence refers to the degree of concordance between the stimulus properties specified as relevant by the individual arranging a reinforcement contingency (behavior analyst, experimenter, teacher, etc.) and the stimulus properties that come to control the behavior of the organism (experimental subject, student, etc.) that experiences those contingencies. This paper summarizes the rationale for analyses of discrimination learning outcomes in terms of stimulus control topography coherence and briefly reviews some of the foundational studies that led to this perspective. We also suggest directions for future research, including pursuit of conceptual and methodological challenges to a complete stimulus control topography coherence analysis of processes involved in discriminated and generalized operants.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2731455/pdf/behavan00006-0017.pdf
dc.subjectDiscrimination Learning
dc.subjectMental and Social Health
dc.subjectNeuroscience and Neurobiology
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Psychology
dc.titleStimulus control topography coherence theory: Foundations and extensions
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleThe Behavior Analyst
dc.source.volume26
dc.source.issue2
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/shriver_pp/40
dc.identifier.contextkey2116493
html.description.abstract<p><em>Stimulus control topography</em> refers to qualitative differences among members of a functional stimulus class. <em>Stimulus control topography coherence</em> refers to the degree of concordance between the stimulus properties specified as relevant by the individual arranging a reinforcement contingency (behavior analyst, experimenter, teacher, etc.) and the stimulus properties that come to control the behavior of the organism (experimental subject, student, etc.) that experiences those contingencies. This paper summarizes the rationale for analyses of discrimination learning outcomes in terms of stimulus control topography coherence and briefly reviews some of the foundational studies that led to this perspective. We also suggest directions for future research, including pursuit of conceptual and methodological challenges to a complete stimulus control topography coherence analysis of processes involved in discriminated and generalized operants.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathshriver_pp/40
dc.contributor.departmentShriver Center
dc.source.pages195-213


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record