Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarros, Romariz S.
dc.contributor.authorGalvao, Olavo F.
dc.contributor.authorBrino, Ana Leda F.
dc.contributor.authorGoulart, Paulo R. K.
dc.contributor.authorMcIlvane, William J.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:53.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:23:28Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:23:28Z
dc.date.issued2005-01-01
dc.date.submitted2011-07-27
dc.identifier.citationBarros, R. S., Galvão, O. F., Brino, A. L. F., Goulart, P. R., & McIlvane, W. J. (2005). Procedural variables in equivalence classes research: Contributions to the study of symbolic behavior. Revista Brasileira De Análise do Comportamento (Brazilian Journal of Behavior Analysis), 1, 15-27. <a href="http://www.rebac.unb.br/vol1_1/rebac_barros_etal_2005.pdf">Link to article on publisher's website</a>
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48968
dc.description<p>Article is in Portuguese with an abstract in English.</p>
dc.description.abstractProcedures typically used in Experimental Analysis of Behavior for studying equivalence classes formation may constitute an experimental model for studying symbolic behavior. Equivalence classes formation and symbolic behavior are alike in the fact that dissimilar elements, once arbitrarily related, become equivalent, that is, they become substitutable concerning to the control of the repertoires related to them. Difficulties in obtaining equivalence classes with non-linguistic organisms have lead some theorists to speculate that equivalence class formation, and possibly symbolic behavior, is a phenomenon dependent on linguistic functioning. Some studies reported in the literature, however, suggest that difficulties to obtain equivalence classes with non-linguistic organisms may be due to procedural failure to effectively establish stimulus control relations planned by the experimenter. This paper presents a brief review of basic concepts on equivalence relations, discusses some of the possibilities for development of non-coherent stimulus control in equivalence studies, and briefly points to studies of alternative procedures to select stimulus control relations that cohere with the experimentally planned relations.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectLearning
dc.subjectBehavior
dc.subjectSymbolism
dc.subjectMental and Social Health
dc.subjectNeuroscience and Neurobiology
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Psychology
dc.titleProcedural Variables in Equivalence Classes Research: Contributions to the Study of Symbolic Behavior
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleRevista Brasileira De Analise do Comportamento = Brazilian Journal of Behavior Analysis
dc.source.volume1
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1042&amp;context=shriver_pp&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/shriver_pp/46
dc.identifier.contextkey2118413
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T17:23:29Z
html.description.abstract<p>Procedures typically used in Experimental Analysis of Behavior for studying equivalence classes formation may constitute an experimental model for studying symbolic behavior. Equivalence classes formation and symbolic behavior are alike in the fact that dissimilar elements, once arbitrarily related, become equivalent, that is, they become substitutable concerning to the control of the repertoires related to them. Difficulties in obtaining equivalence classes with non-linguistic organisms have lead some theorists to speculate that equivalence class formation, and possibly symbolic behavior, is a phenomenon dependent on linguistic functioning. Some studies reported in the literature, however, suggest that difficulties to obtain equivalence classes with non-linguistic organisms may be due to procedural failure to effectively establish stimulus control relations planned by the experimenter. This paper presents a brief review of basic concepts on equivalence relations, discusses some of the possibilities for development of non-coherent stimulus control in equivalence studies, and briefly points to studies of alternative procedures to select stimulus control relations that cohere with the experimentally planned relations.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathshriver_pp/46
dc.contributor.departmentShriver Center
dc.source.pages15-27


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Braz_J_Beh_Anal_2005_Procedura ...
Size:
88.14Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record