Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBonardi, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorClifford, Christine J
dc.contributor.authorHadar, Nira
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:53.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:23:33Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:23:33Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-01
dc.date.submitted2017-07-10
dc.identifier.citationBonardi A, Clifford CJ, Hadar N. A Structured Approach Using the Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR) Building the Evidence for Oral Health Interventions in the Population With Intellectual and Developmental Disability. Evaluation review. 2017 Apr;41(2):111-29. doi: 10.1177/0193841X16664811. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841X16664811">Link to article on publisher's website</a>
dc.identifier.issn1552-3926
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0193841X16664811
dc.identifier.pmid27543432
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48987
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: This review describes the methods used for a systematic review of oral health intervention literature in a target population (people with intellectual and developmental disability (I/DD)), which spans a broad range of interventions and study types, conducted with specialized software. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to demonstrate the review strategy, using the free, online systematic review data repository (SRDR) tool, for oral health interventions aimed at reducing disparities between people with I/DD and the general population. RESEARCH DESIGN: Researchers used online title/abstract review (Abstrackr) and data extraction (SRDR) tools to structure the literature review and data extraction. A practicing clinician and an expert methodologist completed the quality review for each study. The data extraction team reported on the experience of using and customizing the SRDR. RESULTS: Using the SRDR, the team developed four extraction templates for eight key questions and completed extraction on 125 articles. CONCLUSIONS: This report discusses the advantages and disadvantages of using an electronic tool, such as the SRDR, in completing a systematic review in an area of growing research. This review provides valuable insight for researchers who are considering the use of the SRDR.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=27543432&dopt=Abstract">Link to article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X16664811
dc.subjectcontent area
dc.subjectintellectual/developmental disability
dc.subjectmethodological development
dc.subjectoral health
dc.subjectphysical health care and policy
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.subjectHealth Policy
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectMental and Social Health
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Psychology
dc.subjectQuantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies
dc.titleA Structured Approach Using the Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): Building the Evidence for Oral Health Interventions in the Population With Intellectual and Developmental Disability
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleEvaluation review
dc.source.volume41
dc.source.issue2
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/shriver_pp/63
dc.identifier.contextkey10408923
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: This review describes the methods used for a systematic review of oral health intervention literature in a target population (people with intellectual and developmental disability (I/DD)), which spans a broad range of interventions and study types, conducted with specialized software.</p> <p>OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to demonstrate the review strategy, using the free, online systematic review data repository (SRDR) tool, for oral health interventions aimed at reducing disparities between people with I/DD and the general population.</p> <p>RESEARCH DESIGN: Researchers used online title/abstract review (Abstrackr) and data extraction (SRDR) tools to structure the literature review and data extraction. A practicing clinician and an expert methodologist completed the quality review for each study. The data extraction team reported on the experience of using and customizing the SRDR.</p> <p>RESULTS: Using the SRDR, the team developed four extraction templates for eight key questions and completed extraction on 125 articles.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: This report discusses the advantages and disadvantages of using an electronic tool, such as the SRDR, in completing a systematic review in an area of growing research. This review provides valuable insight for researchers who are considering the use of the SRDR.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathshriver_pp/63
dc.contributor.departmentEunice Kennedy Shriver Center, Center for Developmental Disabilities Evaluation and Research
dc.source.pages111-29


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record