Authors
Reynolds, Sara-GraceBaima, Jennifer
Waugh, Debra
Woo, Lauren
Sooy, John
Larkin, Anne C.
Ward, B. Marie
Edmiston, Kathryn
Student Authors
Sara-Grace Reynolds, Lauren Woo, John SooyUMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology OncologyDepartment of Surgery
School of Medicine
Department of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation
Document Type
PosterPublication Date
2015-10-01Keywords
prehabilitationexercises
instruction
shoulder pain
breast cancer surgery
Neoplasms
Orthopedics
Rehabilitation and Therapy
Women's Health
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Objective: To evaluate prehabilitation exercises to improve shoulder pain and abduction range of motion (ROM) after breast cancer surgery; to evaluate methods of exercise teaching; to assess postsurgical seroma formation. Design: Pilot study Setting: Academic medical center Participants: 60 breast cancer patients were randomly assigned to either personal exercise instruction, group 1, n=36, or video only instruction, group 2, n=24. Interventions: Shoulder exercises were assigned to both groups 1 month prior to surgery at an outpatient visit. Group 1 received personal instruction on exercises, plus written exercise instruction, and a link to access an online video. Group 2 received only written exercise instruction and a link to access the online video. Main Outcome Measures: Exercise compliance, pain (via visual analog scale), shoulder abduction ROM (via goniometer), and presence or absence of seroma. Results or Clinical Course: 76% of study patients chose to exercise. There was no difference in exercise compliance between personal instruction versus video teaching. (75%, 24/32 in-person vs. 77%, 10/13 video only, OR=1.03). 66% of patients (20/30) lost greater than 10 degrees shoulder abduction ROM at 1 month post surgery. 29% of patients (9/31) had worse shoulder pain at one month post surgery than at baseline (24%, 6/25 exercisers, and 50%, 3/6 non-exercisers). 15% of patients (4/27) had worse shoulder pain at 3 months post surgery than at baseline (8%, 2/25 exercisers, and 100%, 2/2 non-exercisers). Prehabilitation exercise program inferred no additional risk of seroma formation (21%, 7/33 exercisers vs. 22%, 2/9 non-exercisers OR=.94). Conclusion: In-person teaching does not appear superior to video teaching for prehabilitation exercises in breast cancer. A high quality randomized controlled trial is necessary to assess efficacy of prehabilitation for improving post surgical outcomes. Prehabilitation exercises do not appear to increase risk of seroma formation in breast cancer surgery.DOI
10.13028/hm6f-0x72Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/49100Notes
Presented at the American Academy for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Annual Assembly, Boston, MA, October 2015.
Poster abstract previously published in PM&R Journal.
Rights
Copyright is held by the author(s), with all rights reserved.ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.13028/hm6f-0x72