• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Student Research and Publications
    • T.H. Chan School of Medicine
    • Senior Scholars Program
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Student Research and Publications
    • T.H. Chan School of Medicine
    • Senior Scholars Program
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of eScholarship@UMassChanCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywordsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywords

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutSubmission GuidelinesData Deposit PolicySearchingAccessibilityTerms of UseWebsite Migration FAQ

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Tales from the EMR: Does a 21st-Century Data Warehouse Facilitate Clinical Research for Pancreatic Cancer?

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Edward_Arous_Senior_Scholars_P ...
    Size:
    1005.Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Authors
    Arous, Edward J.
    Smith, Jillian K.
    Ng, Sing Chau
    Tseng, Jennifer F.
    McDade, Theodore P.
    Faculty Advisor
    Jennifer F. Tseng
    UMass Chan Affiliations
    Senior Scholars Program
    Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Analysis and Research
    Document Type
    Poster
    Publication Date
    2011-05-02
    Keywords
    Electronic Health Records
    Medical Records Systems
    Computerized
    Biomedical Research
    Pancreatic Neoplasms
    Data Collection
    International Classification of Diseases
    Health Information Technology
    Health Services Research
    Surgery
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: The importance of an electronic medical record has been highlighted for both clinical care and research. In the current era, data warehouses and repositories have been established to serve the dual function of patient care and investigation. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare a newly developed institutional clinical data warehouse, linked with the hospital information system (HIS), to a prospectively-maintained departmental database. Methods: A novel HIS-linked institutional clinical data warehouse was queried for 9 primary and secondary ICD-9-CM discharge diagnosis codes for pancreatic cancer. The database captured inpatient and outpatient clinical and billing information from a pool of over 2 million patients evaluated at an academic medical institution and its affiliates since 1995. A cohort was identified; following Institutional Review Board approval, demographic and clinical data was obtained. This data was compared to a manually-entered and prospectively-maintained surgical oncology database of the same institution, tracking 394 patients since 1999. Duplicated patients, and those unique to either dataset, were flagged. Patients with diagnosis dates prior to 1999 were excluded to allow comparison over the same time period. For validation purposes, a 10% random sample of remaining patients unique to each dataset underwent manual review of medical records including clinic notes, admission/discharge notes, diagnostic imaging, and pathology reports. Results: 1107 patients were identified from the HIS-linked dataset with pancreatic neoplasm-associated diagnosis codes dating from 1999 to 2009. Of these, 254 (22.9%) were captured in both datasets, while 853 (77.1%) were only in the HIS-linked dataset. Manual review of the 10% subset of the HIS-only group demonstrated that 55.6% of patients were without identifiable pancreatic pathology, suggesting miscoding, while 31.7% had diagnoses consistent with pancreatic neoplasm, and 12.7% had pseudocyst or pancreatitis. Of the 394 patients tracked by surgical oncology, 254 (64.5%) were captured in both datasets, while 140 (35.5%) had not been captured in the HIS-linked dataset. Manual review of the 10% subset of the non-captured patients demonstrated 93.3% with pancreatic neoplasm and 6.7% with pseudocyst or pancreatitis. Lastly, a review of the 10% subset of the 254 patient overlap demonstrated that 87.5% of patients were with pancreatic neoplasm, 8.3% with pseudocyst or pancreatitis, and 4.2% without pancreatic pathology. Conclusions: While technological advances provide a powerful means to automate institutional-level cohort identification and data collection, a high degree of misclassification may be present if queries are based solely on ICD-9-CM discharge codes. For that reason, careful validation and data cleaning are critical steps prior to research use. These results also suggest cautious interpretation of national-level administrative data utilizing ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes. Our findings suggest that the current state-of-the-art data warehouses continue to require clinical correlation and validation through traditional retrospective mechanisms.
    DOI
    10.13028/pe16-bd02
    Permanent Link to this Item
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/49176
    Notes

    Medical student Edward Arous participated in this study as part of the Senior Scholars research program at the University of Massachusetts Medical School.

    Rights
    Copyright is held by the author(s), with all rights reserved.
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.13028/pe16-bd02
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Senior Scholars Program

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Lamar Soutter Library, UMass Chan Medical School | 55 Lake Avenue North | Worcester, MA 01655 USA
    Quick Guide | escholarship@umassmed.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.