Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKleinberg, Teri T.
dc.contributor.authorTzekov, Radouil T.
dc.contributor.authorStein, Linda
dc.contributor.authorRavi, Nathan
dc.contributor.authorKaushal, Shalesh
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:54.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:24:29Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:24:29Z
dc.date.issued2011-07-01
dc.date.submitted2012-11-13
dc.identifier.citationSurv Ophthalmol. 2011 Jul-Aug;56(4):300-23. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2010.09.001. Epub 2011 May 24. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2010.09.001">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0039-6257 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.survophthal.2010.09.001
dc.identifier.pmid21601902
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/49200
dc.description.abstractVitreoretinal disorders constitute a significant portion of treatable ocular disease. Advances in vitreoretinal surgery have included the development and characterization of suitable substitutes for the vitreous. Air, balanced salt solutions, perfluorocarbons, expansile gases, and silicone oil serve integral roles in modern vitreoretinal surgery. Vitreous substitutes vary widely in their properties, serve different clinical functions, and present different shortcomings. Permanent vitreous replacement has been attempted with collagen, hyaluronic acid, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, and natural hydrogel polymers. None, however, have proven to be clinically viable. A long-term vitreous substitute remains to be found, and recent research suggests promise in the area of synthetic polymers. Here we review the currently available vitreous substitutes, as well those in the experimental phase. We classify these compounds based on their functionality, composition, and properties. We also discuss the clinical use, advantages, and shortcomings of the various substitutes. In addition we define the ideal vitreous substitute and highlight the need for a permanent substitute with long-term viability and compatibility. Finally, we attempt to define the future role of biomaterials research and the various functions they may serve in the area of vitreous substitutes.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=21601902&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2010.09.001
dc.subjectEye Diseases
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subject*Viscoelastic Substances
dc.subject*Vitreoretinal Surgery
dc.subjectVitreous Body
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.titleVitreous substitutes: a comprehensive review
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleSurvey of ophthalmology
dc.source.volume56
dc.source.issue4
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/ssp/139
dc.identifier.contextkey3463764
html.description.abstract<p>Vitreoretinal disorders constitute a significant portion of treatable ocular disease. Advances in vitreoretinal surgery have included the development and characterization of suitable substitutes for the vitreous. Air, balanced salt solutions, perfluorocarbons, expansile gases, and silicone oil serve integral roles in modern vitreoretinal surgery. Vitreous substitutes vary widely in their properties, serve different clinical functions, and present different shortcomings. Permanent vitreous replacement has been attempted with collagen, hyaluronic acid, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, and natural hydrogel polymers. None, however, have proven to be clinically viable. A long-term vitreous substitute remains to be found, and recent research suggests promise in the area of synthetic polymers. Here we review the currently available vitreous substitutes, as well those in the experimental phase. We classify these compounds based on their functionality, composition, and properties. We also discuss the clinical use, advantages, and shortcomings of the various substitutes. In addition we define the ideal vitreous substitute and highlight the need for a permanent substitute with long-term viability and compatibility. Finally, we attempt to define the future role of biomaterials research and the various functions they may serve in the area of vitreous substitutes.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathssp/139
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Ophthalmology
dc.source.pages300-23


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record