Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMarie Mullen
dc.contributor.authorCohen, Jason
dc.contributor.authorGoedecke, Eric
dc.contributor.authorCyrkler, Jennifer E.
dc.contributor.authorMangolds, Virginia B.
dc.contributor.authorBateman, Jane
dc.contributor.authorPrzyklenk, Karin
dc.contributor.authorMullen, Marie T.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:55.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:24:35Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:24:35Z
dc.date.issued2010-02-01
dc.date.submitted2006-11-29
dc.identifier.citationCohen J, Goedecke E, Cyrkler JE, Mangolds VB, Bateman J, Przyklenk K, Mullen MT. Early glycemic control in critically ill emergency department patients: pilot trial. West J Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;11(1):20-3. PubMed PMID: 20411069; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2850847. <a href="http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9q58571w">Link to article on publisher's website</a>
dc.identifier.issn1936-9018
dc.identifier.pmid20411069
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/49223
dc.description<p>Jennifer Cyrkler participated in this study as a medical student as part of the Senior Scholars research program at the University of Massachusetts Medical School.</p>
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Glycemic control in the critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patient has been shown to improve morbidity and mortality. We sought to investigate the effect of early glycemic control in critically ill emergency department (ED) patients in a small pilot trial. METHODS: Adult non-trauma, non-pregnant ED patients presenting to a university tertiary referral center and identified as critically ill were eligible for enrollment on a convenience basis. Critical illness was determined upon assignment for ICU admission. Patients were randomized to either ED standard care or glycemic control. Glycemic control involved use of an insulin drip to maintain blood glucose levels between 80-140 mg/dL. Glycemic control continued until ED discharge. Standard patients were managed at ED attending physician discretion. We assessed severity of illness by calculation of APACHE II score. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints included vasopressor requirement, hospital length of stay, and mechanical ventilation requirement. RESULTS: Fifty patients were randomized, 24 to the glycemic group and 26 to the standard care cohort. Four of the 24 patients (17%) in the treatment arm did not receive insulin despite protocol requirements. While receiving insulin, three of 24 patients (13%) had an episode of hypoglycemia. By chance, the patients in the treatment group had a trend toward higher acuity by APACHE II scores. Patient mortality and morbidity were similar despite the acuity difference. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in morbidity and mortality between the two groups. The benefit of glycemic control may be subject to source of illness and to degree of glycemic control, or have no effect. Such questions bear future investigation.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=20411069&dopt=Abstract">Link to article in PubMed</a>
dc.rights<p>Copyright 2010 by the article author(s). This work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial4.0 license, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</p>
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectCritical Care
dc.subjectEmergency Medicine
dc.subjectEndocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism
dc.titleEarly glycemic control in critically ill emergency department patients: pilot trial
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine
dc.source.volume11
dc.source.issue1
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&amp;context=ssp&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/ssp/16
dc.identifier.contextkey227970
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T17:24:35Z
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: Glycemic control in the critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patient has been shown to improve morbidity and mortality. We sought to investigate the effect of early glycemic control in critically ill emergency department (ED) patients in a small pilot trial.</p> <p>METHODS: Adult non-trauma, non-pregnant ED patients presenting to a university tertiary referral center and identified as critically ill were eligible for enrollment on a convenience basis. Critical illness was determined upon assignment for ICU admission. Patients were randomized to either ED standard care or glycemic control. Glycemic control involved use of an insulin drip to maintain blood glucose levels between 80-140 mg/dL. Glycemic control continued until ED discharge. Standard patients were managed at ED attending physician discretion. We assessed severity of illness by calculation of APACHE II score. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints included vasopressor requirement, hospital length of stay, and mechanical ventilation requirement.</p> <p>RESULTS: Fifty patients were randomized, 24 to the glycemic group and 26 to the standard care cohort. Four of the 24 patients (17%) in the treatment arm did not receive insulin despite protocol requirements. While receiving insulin, three of 24 patients (13%) had an episode of hypoglycemia. By chance, the patients in the treatment group had a trend toward higher acuity by APACHE II scores. Patient mortality and morbidity were similar despite the acuity difference.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: There was no difference in morbidity and mortality between the two groups. The benefit of glycemic control may be subject to source of illness and to degree of glycemic control, or have no effect. Such questions bear future investigation.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathssp/16
dc.contributor.departmentSenior Scholars Program
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Emergency Medicine
dc.source.pages20-3


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
eScholarship_UC_item_9q58571w.pdf
Size:
193.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

<p>Copyright 2010 by the article author(s). This work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial4.0 license, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</p>
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as <p>Copyright 2010 by the article author(s). This work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial4.0 license, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</p>