Faculty Advisor
Connie Cepko, MD – Harvard Medical SchoolUMass Chan Affiliations
Senior Scholars ProgramSchool of Medicine
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2018-06-18Keywords
academic ophthalmologyophthalmology Web site
Internet Web site
Internet resource utilization
Web site accessibility
Communication
Health and Medical Administration
Health Information Technology
Medical Education
Ophthalmology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Purpose To evaluate the comprehensiveness and navigation ease of online content from Web sites of U.S. academic ophthalmology departments. Design Cross-sectional analysis of 117 U.S. academic ophthalmology department Web sites from October 1 to October 31, 2017. Methods Data were obtained on various categories, including: clinical access and subspecialty services, social media, patient support and accessibility, residency and fellowship details, and research and faculty characteristics. Percent of Web sites possessing each feature was calculated. In addition, a comparison of content completeness and navigation metrics of Web sites between the US News and World Report top 13 ranked departments and the remaining 96 that possess an ophthalmology residency was performed. Results Greater than 80% of Web sites list a basic core of information online: address, contact information, resident and faculty characteristics, and clinical expertise. However, only 69.2% have capabilities to donate online and 59.8% supply educational material for common eye conditions. Less than half of institutions list emergency and trauma, oncology, and low-vision rehabilitation services; only 49.6% provide a social network platform. Strikingly, accessibility features are limited; scalable text, changeable color, and multilingual capabilities are available in 20.5, 4.3, and 8.5% of Web sites, respectively. In the comparison of top 13 departments with the remaining 96, the high-ranking departments possess more Web site features, but are just as efficient to navigate. Conclusion U.S. academic ophthalmology departments in 2017 provide a basic foundation of online content, but few contain abundant features from the viewpoints of different users.Source
J Acad Ophthalmol 2018; 10(01): e114-e121 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667203. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1055/s-0038-1667203Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/49338Notes
Tedi Begaj participated in this study as a medical student as part of the Senior Scholars research program at the University of Massachusetts Medical School.
Rights
Copyright © 2018 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0Distribution License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1055/s-0038-1667203
Scopus Count
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2018 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0