• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Student Research and Publications
    • T.H. Chan School of Medicine
    • Senior Scholars Program
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Student Research and Publications
    • T.H. Chan School of Medicine
    • Senior Scholars Program
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of eScholarship@UMassChanCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywordsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywords

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutSubmission GuidelinesData Deposit PolicySearchingTerms of UseWebsite Migration FAQ

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Investigation of the Approach to Tracking Cardiac Catheterization Complication

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Manzon_Michele_2004.pdf
    Size:
    77.19Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Authors
    Manzon, Michele
    Faculty Advisor
    Ellison, Richard
    UMass Chan Affiliations
    Department of Medicine
    Document Type
    Abstract
    Publication Date
    2004-06-01
    Keywords
    Heart Catheterization
    adverse effects
    Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems
    Cardiology
    Health Services Research
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background:Infection Control has been retrieving Meditech information to track infection rates during hospitalization and in the immediate 30 day following hospitalization. Given the success of this approach, it was hypothesized that this report could be used to track other adverse outcomes. We purposed to compare using Meditech generated information to the presently used ACC database for tracking adverse events post cardiac catheterization. Methods:: We retrospectively generated a report of all patients who had a cardiac catheterization from April, 2003- September, 2003 who were either readmitted or had cultures in the 30 days following their procedure. All patients who had potentially adverse events in the electronic and/or paper medical record were reviewed to determine the nature of the event. Results:We generated 831 individual patient reports; of these 508 had a cardiac catheterization and 308 patients had a potentially adverse outcome. The ACC database had 107 records during the same time period, of which the Meditech system shared 30 patients with the ACC. Five of these patients had the same complication as demonstrated in the ACC database and 25 had not previously reported adverse outcomes. We found 77 infections, 46 cardiovascular events, 23 bleeding events, 182 occlusive events, and 14 other events. Conclusions:: Using the Meditech System to track adverse events provides a complementary system to the presently employed ACC database. The system is able to track events that occurred post-discharge, something which is not presently done with the ACC. However, the ACC tracks events which occur while in the hospital, which the Meditech reporting system does not do. Given the referral base of approximately 40% of patients at this tertiary referral center, the major limitation to the Meditech system is that it does not account for patients who do not receive follow-up care in the UMASS Memorial System of Hospitals. More direct means of follow-up would be needed for this purpose.
    Permanent Link to this Item
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/49371
    Notes

    The author participated in this study as a medical student in the Senior Scholars research program at the University of Massachusetts Medical School.

    Rights
    Copyright the Author(s). All rights reserved.
    Collections
    Senior Scholars Program

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Lamar Soutter Library, UMass Chan Medical School | 55 Lake Avenue North | Worcester, MA 01655 USA
    Quick Guide | escholarship@umassmed.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.