Impact of the new kidney allocation system A2/A2B --> B policy on access to transplantation among minority candidates
Authors
Martins, Paulo N.A.Mustian, Margaux N.
MacLennan, Paul A.
Ortiz, Jorge A.
Akoad, Mohamed
Caicedo, Juan Carlos
Echeverri, Gabriel J.
Gray, Stephen H.
Lopez-Soler, Reynold I.
Gunasekaran, Ganesh
Kelly, Beau
Mobley, Constance M.
Black, Sylvester M.
Esquivel, Carlos
Locke, Jayme E.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Surgery, Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, UMass Memorial Medical CenterDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2018-08-01Keywords
disparitiesethics and public policy
ethnicity/race
health services and outcomes research
kidney transplantation/nephrology
organ procurement and allocation
Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment
Bioethics and Medical Ethics
Health Policy
Health Services Administration
Health Services Research
Nephrology
Race and Ethnicity
Surgery
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Blood group B candidates, many of whom represent ethnic minorities, have historically had diminished access to deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). The new national kidney allocation system (KAS) preferentially allocates blood group A2/A2B deceased donor kidneys to B recipients to address this ethnic and blood group disparity. No study has yet examined the impact of KAS on A2 incompatible (A2i) DDKT for blood group B recipients overall or among minorities. A case-control study of adult blood group B DDKT recipients from 2013 to 2017 was performed, as reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Cases were defined as recipients of A2/A2B kidneys, whereas controls were all remaining recipients of non-A2/A2B kidneys. A2i DDKT trends were compared from the pre-KAS (1/1/2013-12/3/2014) to the post-KAS period (12/4/2014-2/28/2017) using multivariable logistic regression. Post-KAS, there was a 4.9-fold increase in the likelihood of A2i DDKT, compared to the pre-KAS period (odds ratio [OR] 4.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.67-6.60). However, compared to whites, there was no difference in the likelihood of A2i DDKT among minorities post-KAS. Although KAS resulted in increasing A2/A2B-->B DDKT, the likelihood of A2i DDKT among minorities, relative to whites, was not improved. Further discussion regarding A2/A2B-->B policy revisions aiming to improve DDKT access for minorities is warranted.Source
Am J Transplant. 2018 Aug;18(8):1947-1953. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14719. Epub 2018 Mar 31. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1111/ajt.14719Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/49747PubMed ID
29509285Related Resources
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/ajt.14719