Surgery and radiotherapy for retroperitoneal and abdominal sarcoma: both necessary and sufficient
Authors
Zhou, ZhengMcDade, Theodore P.
Simons, Jessica P.
Ng, Sing Chau
Lambert, Laura A.
Whalen, Giles F.
Shah, Shimul A.
Tseng, Jennifer F.
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2010-05-19Keywords
Cohort StudiesFemale
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Neoplasm Staging
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
Retroperitoneal Neoplasms
Retrospective Studies
SEER Program
Sarcoma
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
Surgery
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of surgical resection and radiotherapy (RT) in retroperitoneal or abdominal sarcoma. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, 1988-2005. PATIENTS: Patients 18 years or older with initial diagnosis of primary retroperitoneal and nonvisceral abdominal sarcoma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival for 2 years after diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier survival was stratified based on surgery and RT status. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess adjusted effects of surgery and RT on survival in patients with locoregional disease. RESULTS: Of 1901 patients with locoregional disease, 1547 (81.8%) underwent resection; 447 (23.5%) received RT. Overall, patients who received both surgery and RT demonstrated improved survival compared with patients who underwent either therapy alone; patients undergoing monotherapy in turn had more favorable survival compared with patients who received neither therapy (P < .001, log rank). Cox analysis demonstrated that surgical resection (hazard ratio [HR], 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.29; P < .001) and RT (0.78; 0.63-0.95; P = .01) independently predicted improved survival in locoregional disease only. In adjusted analyses stratified for American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) stage, for stage I disease (n = 694), RT provided an additional benefit (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.96; P = .04) independent of that from resection (0.35; 0.21-0.58; P < .001). For stage II/III (n = 552), resection remained protective (HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.18-0.32; P < .001); however, RT was no longer associated with a significant benefit (0.78; 0.58-1.06; P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: In a national cohort of retroperitoneal and abdominal sarcomas, surgical resection was associated with significant survival benefits for AJCC disease stages I to III. Radiotherapy provided additional benefit for patients with stage I disease. Resection should be offered to reasonable surgical candidates with nonmetastatic retroperitoneal/abdominal sarcomas; radiotherapy may most benefit patients with early-stage disease.Source
Arch Surg. 2010 May;145(5):426-31. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1001/archsurg.2010.70Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/49797PubMed ID
20479339Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1001/archsurg.2010.70