Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhou, Zheng
dc.contributor.authorMcDade, Theodore P.
dc.contributor.authorSimons, Jessica P.
dc.contributor.authorNg, Sing Chau
dc.contributor.authorLambert, Laura A.
dc.contributor.authorWhalen, Giles F.
dc.contributor.authorShah, Shimul A.
dc.contributor.authorTseng, Jennifer F.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:59.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:27:09Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:27:09Z
dc.date.issued2010-05-19
dc.date.submitted2011-06-21
dc.identifier.citationArch Surg. 2010 May;145(5):426-31. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2010.70">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0004-0010 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/archsurg.2010.70
dc.identifier.pmid20479339
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/49797
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of surgical resection and radiotherapy (RT) in retroperitoneal or abdominal sarcoma. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, 1988-2005. PATIENTS: Patients 18 years or older with initial diagnosis of primary retroperitoneal and nonvisceral abdominal sarcoma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival for 2 years after diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier survival was stratified based on surgery and RT status. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess adjusted effects of surgery and RT on survival in patients with locoregional disease. RESULTS: Of 1901 patients with locoregional disease, 1547 (81.8%) underwent resection; 447 (23.5%) received RT. Overall, patients who received both surgery and RT demonstrated improved survival compared with patients who underwent either therapy alone; patients undergoing monotherapy in turn had more favorable survival compared with patients who received neither therapy (P < .001, log rank). Cox analysis demonstrated that surgical resection (hazard ratio [HR], 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.29; P < .001) and RT (0.78; 0.63-0.95; P = .01) independently predicted improved survival in locoregional disease only. In adjusted analyses stratified for American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) stage, for stage I disease (n = 694), RT provided an additional benefit (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.96; P = .04) independent of that from resection (0.35; 0.21-0.58; P < .001). For stage II/III (n = 552), resection remained protective (HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.18-0.32; P < .001); however, RT was no longer associated with a significant benefit (0.78; 0.58-1.06; P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: In a national cohort of retroperitoneal and abdominal sarcomas, surgical resection was associated with significant survival benefits for AJCC disease stages I to III. Radiotherapy provided additional benefit for patients with stage I disease. Resection should be offered to reasonable surgical candidates with nonmetastatic retroperitoneal/abdominal sarcomas; radiotherapy may most benefit patients with early-stage disease.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=20479339&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2010.70
dc.subjectCohort Studies
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectNeoplasm Recurrence, Local
dc.subjectNeoplasm Staging
dc.subjectRadiotherapy, Adjuvant
dc.subjectRetroperitoneal Neoplasms
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectSEER Program
dc.subjectSarcoma
dc.subjectSurvival Rate
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleSurgery and radiotherapy for retroperitoneal and abdominal sarcoma: both necessary and sufficient
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleArchives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)
dc.source.volume145
dc.source.issue5
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/surgery_pp/70
dc.identifier.contextkey2069167
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of surgical resection and radiotherapy (RT) in retroperitoneal or abdominal sarcoma.</p> <p>DESIGN: Retrospective cohort.</p> <p>SETTING: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, 1988-2005.</p> <p>PATIENTS: Patients 18 years or older with initial diagnosis of primary retroperitoneal and nonvisceral abdominal sarcoma.</p> <p>MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival for 2 years after diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier survival was stratified based on surgery and RT status. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess adjusted effects of surgery and RT on survival in patients with locoregional disease.</p> <p>RESULTS: Of 1901 patients with locoregional disease, 1547 (81.8%) underwent resection; 447 (23.5%) received RT. Overall, patients who received both surgery and RT demonstrated improved survival compared with patients who underwent either therapy alone; patients undergoing monotherapy in turn had more favorable survival compared with patients who received neither therapy (P < .001, log rank). Cox analysis demonstrated that surgical resection (hazard ratio [HR], 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.29; P < .001) and RT (0.78; 0.63-0.95; P = .01) independently predicted improved survival in locoregional disease only. In adjusted analyses stratified for American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) stage, for stage I disease (n = 694), RT provided an additional benefit (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.96; P = .04) independent of that from resection (0.35; 0.21-0.58; P < .001). For stage II/III (n = 552), resection remained protective (HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.18-0.32; P < .001); however, RT was no longer associated with a significant benefit (0.78; 0.58-1.06; P = .11).</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: In a national cohort of retroperitoneal and abdominal sarcomas, surgical resection was associated with significant survival benefits for AJCC disease stages I to III. Radiotherapy provided additional benefit for patients with stage I disease. Resection should be offered to reasonable surgical candidates with nonmetastatic retroperitoneal/abdominal sarcomas; radiotherapy may most benefit patients with early-stage disease.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathsurgery_pp/70
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Surgery
dc.source.pages426-31


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record