Predictors of major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgeon, hospital, or patient
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Murphy, Melissa M.Ng, Sing Chau
Simons, Jessica P.
Csikesz, Nicholas G.
Shah, Shimul A.
Tseng, Jennifer F.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of SurgeryDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2010-07-09Keywords
AdultAge Factors
Aged
Chi-Square Distribution
*Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
Comorbidity
Female
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
United States
Surgery
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: Regionalization of care has been proposed for complex operations based on hospital/surgeon volume-mortality relationships. Controversy exists about whether more common procedures should be performed at high-volume centers. Using mortality alone to assess routine operations is hampered by relatively low perioperative mortality. We used a large national database to analyze the risk of major in-hospital complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing LC were identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 1998-2006 from states with surgeon/hospital identifiers. Previously validated major complications including acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary compromise, postoperative infection, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, hemorrhage, and reoperation were assessed. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed and independent risk factors of complications were identified. RESULTS: A total of 1,102,071 weighted patient discharges were identified, with a complication rate of 6.8%. Univariate analyses showed that advanced age, male gender, and higher Charlson Comorbidity Score were associated with higher complication rates (p < 0.0001). Higher surgeon volume (>or=36/year versus <12/year) and higher hospital volume (>or=225/year versus < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis showed that advanced age (65 years or older versus younger than 65 years; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.16; 95% CI, 2.01-2.32), male gender (AOR = 1.14; 95% CI, 1.10-1.19), and comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Score 2 versus 0; AOR = 2.49; 95% CI, 2.34-2.65) were associated with complications. Neither surgeon nor hospital volume was independently associated with increased risk of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Major in-hospital complications after LC are associated with individual patient characteristics rather than surgeon or hospital operative volumes. These results suggest regionalization of general surgical procedures might be unnecessary. Rather, careful patient selection and preoperative preparation can diminish overall complication rates. Inc. All rights reserved.Source
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Jul;211(1):73-80. Epub 2010 May 26. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.050Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/49819PubMed ID
20610252Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.050