Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorColombo, Beth
dc.contributor.authorSingla, Anand
dc.contributor.authorLi, YouFu
dc.contributor.authorTseng, Jennifer F.
dc.contributor.authorSaidi, Reza F.
dc.contributor.authorBozorgzadeh, Adel
dc.contributor.authorShah, Shimul A.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:59.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:27:15Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:27:15Z
dc.date.issued2010-12-03
dc.date.submitted2011-06-23
dc.identifier.citationWorld J Surg. 2010 Dec;34(12):2985-90. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0770-3">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0364-2313 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00268-010-0770-3
dc.identifier.pmid20811748
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/49820
dc.description<p>Anand Singla participated in this study as a medical student in the University of Massachusetts Medical School's Senior Scholars research program.</p>
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Recent United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data suggest that live kidney donation is stagnant. Current practices and trends in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) among the transplant community remain largely unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 1998 to 2006, patients undergoing LDN (n = 9,437) were identified. RESULTS: Live kidney donation in the United States did not show an increase in the NIS. Of the live donor cases recorded, 58 (0.61%) were associated with a major short-term complication. The number of LDNs performed by transplant surgeons decreased over the study period from 76.5% in 1998 to 30.4% in 2006. CONCLUSIONS: In the United Stares, LDNs are performed safely with a low short-term complication rate. Despite the use of laparoscopy and the increased need of donor organs, the rate of LDN in kidney transplantation has not increased proportionally.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=20811748&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0770-3
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectKidney Transplantation
dc.subjectLaparoscopy
dc.subject*Living Donors
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectNephrectomy
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleCurrent trends and short-term outcomes of live donor nephrectomy: a population-based analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleWorld journal of surgery
dc.source.volume34
dc.source.issue12
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/surgery_pp/97
dc.identifier.contextkey2073455
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: Recent United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data suggest that live kidney donation is stagnant. Current practices and trends in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) among the transplant community remain largely unknown.</p> <p>MATERIALS AND METHODS: From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 1998 to 2006, patients undergoing LDN (n = 9,437) were identified.</p> <p>RESULTS: Live kidney donation in the United States did not show an increase in the NIS. Of the live donor cases recorded, 58 (0.61%) were associated with a major short-term complication. The number of LDNs performed by transplant surgeons decreased over the study period from 76.5% in 1998 to 30.4% in 2006.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: In the United Stares, LDNs are performed safely with a low short-term complication rate. Despite the use of laparoscopy and the increased need of donor organs, the rate of LDN in kidney transplantation has not increased proportionally.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathsurgery_pp/97
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Surgery
dc.source.pages2985-90


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record