Infant growth outcomes after maternal tenofovir disoproxil fumarate use during pregnancy
Authors
Ransom, Carla E.Huo, Yanling
Patel, Kunjal
Scott, Gwendolyn B.
Watts, Heather D.
Williams, Paige
Siberry, George K.
Livingston, Elizabeth G.
P1025 Team of the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group
UMass Chan Affiliations
UMass Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2013-12-01Keywords
tenofovirmother-to-child transmission
infant growth
TDF
HIV
pregnancy
UMCCTS funding
Immunology and Infectious Disease
Infectious Disease
Maternal and Child Health
Pediatrics
Translational Medical Research
Virus Diseases
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether maternal use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for treatment of HIV in pregnancy predicts fetal and infant growth. METHODS: The study population included HIV-uninfected live-born singleton infants of mothers enrolled in the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocol P1025 (born 2002-2011) in the United States and exposed in utero to a combined (triple or more) antiretroviral regimen. Infant weight at birth and 6 months was compared between infants exposed and unexposed to tenofovir in utero using 2-sample t test, chi test, and multivariable linear and logistic regression models, including demographic and maternal characteristics. RESULTS: Among 2025 infants with measured birth weight, there was no difference between those exposed (N = 630, 31%) versus unexposed to tenofovir in mean birth weight (2.75 vs. 2.77 kg, P = 0.64) or mean gestational age- and sex-adjusted birth weight z-score (WASZ) (0.14 vs. 0.14, P = 0.90). Among 1496 infants followed for 6 months, there was no difference in mean weight at 6 months between tenofovir-exposed (N = 457, 31%) and tenofovir-unexposed infants (7.64 vs. 7.59 kg, P = 0.52) or in mean WASZ (0.29 vs. 0.26, P = 0.61). Tenofovir exposure during the second/third trimester, relative to no exposure, significantly predicted underweight (WASZ < 5%) at age 6 months [odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 2.06 (1.01 to 3.95), P = 0.04]. Duration of tenofovir exposure did not predict neonatal or infant growth. CONCLUSIONS: By most measures, in utero exposure to tenofovir did not significantly predict infant birth weight or growth through 6 months of age.Source
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 Dec 1;64(4):374-81. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182a7adb2. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182a7adb2Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/50366PubMed ID
24169122Notes
The UMass Center for Clinical and Translational Science was a participating site for this study: 7301 WNE Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS CRS (Sharon Cormier, RN; Katherine Luzuriaga, MD; Supported by CTSA Grant Number: 8UL1TR000161).
Related Resources
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182a7adb2