Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFouayzi, Hassan
dc.contributor.authorAsh, Arlene S.
dc.contributor.authorRosen, Amy K.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:11:02.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:29:44Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:29:44Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-14
dc.date.submitted2020-04-22
dc.identifier.citation<p>Fouayzi H, Ash AS, Rosen AK. A cardiovascular disease risk prediction algorithm for use with the Medicare current beneficiary survey. Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 14. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13290. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32285938. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13290">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn0017-9124 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1475-6773.13290
dc.identifier.pmid32285938
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/50388
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To develop a cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk score that can be used to quantify CVD risk in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS). DATA SOURCES: We used 1999-2013 MCBS data. STUDY DESIGN: We used a backward stepwise approach and cox proportional hazards regressions to build and validate a new CVD risk score, similar to the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), using only information available in MCBS. To assess its performance, we calculated C statistics and examined calibration plots. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We studied 21 968 community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older without pre-existing CVD. We obtained risk factors from both survey and claims data. We used claims data to derive "CVD event within 3 years" following the FRS definition of CVD. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: About five percent of MCBS participants developed a CVD event over a mean follow-up period of 348 days. Our final MCBS-based model added morbidity burden, reported general health status, and functional limitation to the traditional FRS predictors of CVD. This model had relatively fair discrimination (C statistic = 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.71) and performed well on validation (C = 0.68; CI, 0.66-0.70). More importantly, the plot of observed CVD outcomes versus predicted ones showed that this model had a good calibration. CONCLUSIONS: Our new CVD risk score can be calculated using MCBS data, thereby extending the survey's ability to quantify CVD risk in the Medicare population and better inform both health policy and health services research.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=32285938&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13290
dc.subjectUMCCTS funding
dc.subjectcardiovascular diseases
dc.subjecthealth policy
dc.subjecthealth risk assessment
dc.subjectproportional hazards models
dc.subjectsurvey methods
dc.subjectCardiology
dc.subjectCardiovascular Diseases
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectHealth Policy
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectTranslational Medical Research
dc.titleA cardiovascular disease risk prediction algorithm for use with the Medicare current beneficiary survey
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleHealth services research
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/umccts_pubs/214
dc.identifier.contextkey17486484
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: To develop a cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk score that can be used to quantify CVD risk in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS).</p> <p>DATA SOURCES: We used 1999-2013 MCBS data.</p> <p>STUDY DESIGN: We used a backward stepwise approach and cox proportional hazards regressions to build and validate a new CVD risk score, similar to the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), using only information available in MCBS. To assess its performance, we calculated C statistics and examined calibration plots.</p> <p>DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We studied 21 968 community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older without pre-existing CVD. We obtained risk factors from both survey and claims data. We used claims data to derive "CVD event within 3 years" following the FRS definition of CVD.</p> <p>PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: About five percent of MCBS participants developed a CVD event over a mean follow-up period of 348 days. Our final MCBS-based model added morbidity burden, reported general health status, and functional limitation to the traditional FRS predictors of CVD. This model had relatively fair discrimination (C statistic = 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.71) and performed well on validation (C = 0.68; CI, 0.66-0.70). More importantly, the plot of observed CVD outcomes versus predicted ones showed that this model had a good calibration.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Our new CVD risk score can be calculated using MCBS data, thereby extending the survey's ability to quantify CVD risk in the Medicare population and better inform both health policy and health services research.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathumccts_pubs/214
dc.contributor.departmentPopulation and Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.contributor.departmentMeyers Primary Care Institute
dc.contributor.departmentUMass Chan Analytics
dc.contributor.departmentBiostatistics and Health Services Research


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record