Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRao, Sowmya R.
dc.contributor.authorDesRoches, Catherine M.
dc.contributor.authorDonelan, Karen
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Eric G.
dc.contributor.authorMiralles, Paola D.
dc.contributor.authorJha, Ashish K.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:11:03.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:30:24Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:30:24Z
dc.date.issued2011-05-01
dc.date.submitted2012-05-08
dc.identifier.citationJ Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 May 1;18(3):271-5. doi 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000010. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000010" target="_blank">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1067-5027 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000010
dc.identifier.pmid21486885
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/50510
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To examine variation in the adoption of electronic health record (EHR) functionalities and their use patterns, barriers to adoption, and perceived benefits by physician practice size. DESIGN: Mailed survey of a nationally representative random sample of practicing physicians identified from the Physician Masterfile of the American Medical Association. Measurements We measured, stratified by practice size: (1) availability of EHR functionalities, (2) functionality use, (3) barriers to the adoption and use of EHR, and (4) impact of the EHR on the practice and quality of patient care. RESULTS: With a response rate of 62%, we found that < 2% of physicians in solo or two-physician (small) practices reported a fully functional EHR and 5% reported a basic EHR compared with 13% of physicians from 11+ group (largest group) practices with a fully functional system and 26% with a basic system. Between groups, a 21-46% difference in specific functionalities available was reported. Among adopters there were moderate to large differences in the use of the EHR systems. Financial barriers were more likely to be reported by smaller practices, along with concerns about future obsolescence. These differences were sizable (13-16%) and statistically significant (p < 0.001). All adopters reported similar benefits. Limitations Although we have adjusted for response bias, influences may still exist. CONCLUSION: Our study found that physicians in small practices have lower levels of EHR adoption and that these providers were less likely to use these systems. Ensuring that unique barriers are addressed will be critical to the widespread meaningful use of EHR systems among small practices.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=21486885&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3078653/pdf/amiajnl-2010-000010.pdf
dc.subject*Diffusion of Innovation
dc.subjectElectronic Health Records
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectGroup Practice
dc.subjectHealth Care Surveys
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subject*Physician's Practice Patterns
dc.subjectPractice Management, Medical
dc.subjectPrivate Practice
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectUMCCTS funding
dc.subjectHealth and Medical Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleElectronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
dc.source.volume18
dc.source.issue3
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/umccts_pubs/8
dc.identifier.contextkey2828668
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: To examine variation in the adoption of electronic health record (EHR) functionalities and their use patterns, barriers to adoption, and perceived benefits by physician practice size.</p> <p>DESIGN: Mailed survey of a nationally representative random sample of practicing physicians identified from the Physician Masterfile of the American Medical Association. Measurements We measured, stratified by practice size: (1) availability of EHR functionalities, (2) functionality use, (3) barriers to the adoption and use of EHR, and (4) impact of the EHR on the practice and quality of patient care.</p> <p>RESULTS: With a response rate of 62%, we found that < 2% of physicians in solo or two-physician (small) practices reported a fully functional EHR and 5% reported a basic EHR compared with 13% of physicians from 11+ group (largest group) practices with a fully functional system and 26% with a basic system. Between groups, a 21-46% difference in specific functionalities available was reported. Among adopters there were moderate to large differences in the use of the EHR systems. Financial barriers were more likely to be reported by smaller practices, along with concerns about future obsolescence. These differences were sizable (13-16%) and statistically significant (p < 0.001). All adopters reported similar benefits. Limitations Although we have adjusted for response bias, influences may still exist.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: Our study found that physicians in small practices have lower levels of EHR adoption and that these providers were less likely to use these systems. Ensuring that unique barriers are addressed will be critical to the widespread meaningful use of EHR systems among small practices.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathumccts_pubs/8
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.source.pages271-5


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record