Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDriban, Jeffrey B.
dc.contributor.authorPrice, Lori Lyn
dc.contributor.authorLaValley, Michael P.
dc.contributor.authorLo, Grace H.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Ming
dc.contributor.authorHarkey, Matthew S.
dc.contributor.authorCanavatchel, Amanda
dc.contributor.authorMcAlindon, Timothy E.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:11:04.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:30:31Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:30:31Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-01
dc.date.submitted2022-05-19
dc.identifier.citation<p>Driban JB, Price LL, LaValley MP, Lo GH, Zhang M, Harkey MS, Canavatchel A, McAlindon TE. Novel Framework for Measuring Whole Knee Osteoarthritis Progression Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022 May;74(5):799-808. doi: 10.1002/acr.24512. Epub 2022 Mar 1. PMID: 33202111; PMCID: PMC8631200. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24512">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn2151-464X (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/acr.24512
dc.identifier.pmid33202111
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/50532
dc.description<p>The UMass Center for Clinical and Translational Science (UMCCTS), UL1TR001453, helped fund this study.</p>
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: We developed and validated a set of composite scores that combine quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based measurements of hyaline cartilage damage, bone marrow lesions (BMLs), and effusion-synovitis into composite scores. METHODS: We selected 300 participants (n = 100 for development cohort; n = 200 for validation cohort) from the Osteoarthritis Initiative with complete clinical, radiographic, and MRI data at baseline and 24 months. We used semiautomated programs to quantify tibiofemoral and patellar cartilage damage, BML volume, and whole-knee effusion-synovitis volume. The candidate composite scores were formed by summing changes from baseline to 24 months based on prespecified methods. We evaluated the candidate composite scores for 1) the ability to differentiate groups with and without knee osteoarthritis progression (17 radiographic and patient-reported definitions), 2) sensitivity to change (standardized response means), and 3) relative performance relating to legacy outcome measures of knee osteoarthritis progression. RESULTS: Three of 13 developed composite scores qualified for testing in the validation cohort (ranked by sensitivity to change): whole-knee cumulative cartilage damage, unweighted total knee score, and BML plus effusion-synovitis volume. Change in cumulative cartilage damage associated with radiographic progression (Kellgren/Lawrence grade: odds ratio [OR] 1.84; joint space width progression: OR 2.11). Changes in the unweighted total knee score (OR 1.97) and BML plus effusion-synovitis score (OR 1.92) associated with Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index knee pain progression. CONCLUSION: Two composite scores emerged, reflecting discrete domains of knee osteoarthritis progression. First, cumulative damage, which is measured by a whole-knee cartilage damage score, reflects the damage accrued over time. Second, dynamic disease activity, which is measured by a BML plus effusion-synovitis score, relates to changes in a patient's state of disease and symptoms.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=33202111&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24512
dc.subjectUMCCTS funding
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal Diseases
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.subjectRheumatology
dc.subjectTranslational Medical Research
dc.titleNovel Framework for Measuring Whole Knee Osteoarthritis Progression Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleArthritis care and research
dc.source.volume74
dc.source.issue5
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/umccts_pubs/277
dc.identifier.contextkey29264557
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: We developed and validated a set of composite scores that combine quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based measurements of hyaline cartilage damage, bone marrow lesions (BMLs), and effusion-synovitis into composite scores.</p> <p>METHODS: We selected 300 participants (n = 100 for development cohort; n = 200 for validation cohort) from the Osteoarthritis Initiative with complete clinical, radiographic, and MRI data at baseline and 24 months. We used semiautomated programs to quantify tibiofemoral and patellar cartilage damage, BML volume, and whole-knee effusion-synovitis volume. The candidate composite scores were formed by summing changes from baseline to 24 months based on prespecified methods. We evaluated the candidate composite scores for 1) the ability to differentiate groups with and without knee osteoarthritis progression (17 radiographic and patient-reported definitions), 2) sensitivity to change (standardized response means), and 3) relative performance relating to legacy outcome measures of knee osteoarthritis progression.</p> <p>RESULTS: Three of 13 developed composite scores qualified for testing in the validation cohort (ranked by sensitivity to change): whole-knee cumulative cartilage damage, unweighted total knee score, and BML plus effusion-synovitis volume. Change in cumulative cartilage damage associated with radiographic progression (Kellgren/Lawrence grade: odds ratio [OR] 1.84; joint space width progression: OR 2.11). Changes in the unweighted total knee score (OR 1.97) and BML plus effusion-synovitis score (OR 1.92) associated with Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index knee pain progression.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: Two composite scores emerged, reflecting discrete domains of knee osteoarthritis progression. First, cumulative damage, which is measured by a whole-knee cartilage damage score, reflects the damage accrued over time. Second, dynamic disease activity, which is measured by a BML plus effusion-synovitis score, relates to changes in a patient's state of disease and symptoms.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathumccts_pubs/277
dc.contributor.departmentUMass Center for Clinical and Translational Science
dc.source.pages799-808


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record