Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBogden, A. E.
dc.contributor.authorCostanza, Mary E.
dc.contributor.authorReich, S. D.
dc.contributor.authorGriffin, T. W.
dc.contributor.authorCobb, W. R.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:11:04.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:30:53Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:30:53Z
dc.date.issued1983-01-01
dc.date.submitted2007-07-30
dc.identifier.citationBreast Cancer Res Treat. 1983;3(1):33-8.
dc.identifier.issn0167-6806 (Print)
dc.identifier.pmid6871480
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/50608
dc.description.abstractFeasibility of utilizing the 6-day subrenal capsule (SRC) assay to screen drugs against fresh surgical explants of human tumors was confirmed by testing six clinically active chemotherapeutic agents against 141 human breast cancers. Response rates of the six drugs obtained in the assay compared favorably with clinical response rates for the same drugs as reported by Carter (5). The evaluable assay rate for breast tumors was 92% as compared to 89% for gynecologic tumors. Innate drug resistance was indicated with 16 of 57 tumors (28%) which did not respond to any of the six agents tested. Differences in responsiveness of tumors to each agent in a potential three-drug combination of either CMF or CAF suggest that the effectiveness of multiagent therapy might be enhanced if the individual agents of a potential drug combination were selected on the basis of tumor sensitivity to each of the agents in a predictive assay. Although cross-resistance between L-PAM and cytoxan was demonstrated and was statistically significant, 31% of these tumors responded individually to either one or the other agent, suggesting caution in extrapolating concomitance in activity between these two alkylators.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=6871480&dopt=Abstract">Link to article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1097-0142(19810701)48:1%3C10::AID-CNCR2820480105%3E3.0.CO;2-I/pdf
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Agents
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms
dc.subjectDrug Evaluation, Preclinical
dc.subjectDrug Resistance
dc.subjectDrug Therapy, Combination
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMice
dc.subjectMice, Nude
dc.subjectNeoplasm Transplantation
dc.subjectTransplantation, Heterologous
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.subjectWomen's Studies
dc.titleChemotherapy responsiveness of human breast tumors in the 6-day subrenal capsule assay: an update
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleBreast cancer research and treatment
dc.source.volume3
dc.source.issue1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/wfc_pp/132
dc.identifier.contextkey330368
html.description.abstract<p>Feasibility of utilizing the 6-day subrenal capsule (SRC) assay to screen drugs against fresh surgical explants of human tumors was confirmed by testing six clinically active chemotherapeutic agents against 141 human breast cancers. Response rates of the six drugs obtained in the assay compared favorably with clinical response rates for the same drugs as reported by Carter (5). The evaluable assay rate for breast tumors was 92% as compared to 89% for gynecologic tumors. Innate drug resistance was indicated with 16 of 57 tumors (28%) which did not respond to any of the six agents tested. Differences in responsiveness of tumors to each agent in a potential three-drug combination of either CMF or CAF suggest that the effectiveness of multiagent therapy might be enhanced if the individual agents of a potential drug combination were selected on the basis of tumor sensitivity to each of the agents in a predictive assay. Although cross-resistance between L-PAM and cytoxan was demonstrated and was statistically significant, 31% of these tumors responded individually to either one or the other agent, suggesting caution in extrapolating concomitance in activity between these two alkylators.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathwfc_pp/132
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology
dc.source.pages33-8


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record