Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZapka, Jane G.
dc.contributor.authorHarris, D. R.
dc.contributor.authorStoddard, Anne M.
dc.contributor.authorCostanza, Mary E.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:11:04.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:30:56Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:30:56Z
dc.date.issued1991-09-01
dc.date.submitted2007-07-30
dc.identifier.citation<p>Eval Health Prof. 1991 Sep;14(3):356-67.</p>
dc.identifier.issn0163-2787 (Print)
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/016327879101400308
dc.identifier.pmid10113888
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/50618
dc.description.abstractThis research explored the construct validity of hypothesized survey items and data reduction procedures for selected psychosocial constructs which are frequently used in breast cancer screening research. Factor analysis was used to validate relationships between survey items and hypothesized constructs suggested by several theories of behavior change. These constructs included perceived barriers and benefits of breast cancer screening compliance behavior. Reliability analyses were then used to evaluate the consistency of the resultant scales applied across three data sets, resulting from surveys conducted by two different methods (telephone and in-person interview) over three time periods. These analyses found reliability coefficients ranging from .53 to .69.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10113888&dopt=Abstract">Link to article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1177/016327879101400308
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms
dc.subjectFactor Analysis, Statistical
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMammography
dc.subjectMass Screening
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPatient Compliance
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.subjectWomen's Studies
dc.titleValidity and reliability of psychosocial factors related to breast cancer screening
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleEvaluation and the health professions
dc.source.volume14
dc.source.issue3
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/wfc_pp/147
dc.identifier.contextkey330383
html.description.abstract<p>This research explored the construct validity of hypothesized survey items and data reduction procedures for selected psychosocial constructs which are frequently used in breast cancer screening research. Factor analysis was used to validate relationships between survey items and hypothesized constructs suggested by several theories of behavior change. These constructs included perceived barriers and benefits of breast cancer screening compliance behavior. Reliability analyses were then used to evaluate the consistency of the resultant scales applied across three data sets, resulting from surveys conducted by two different methods (telephone and in-person interview) over three time periods. These analyses found reliability coefficients ranging from .53 to .69.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathwfc_pp/147
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology
dc.source.pages356-67


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record