Applying a stage model of behavior change to colon cancer screening
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Costanza, Mary E.Luckmann, Roger S
Stoddard, Anne M.
Avrunin, Jill S.
White, Mary Jo
Stark, Jennifer Rider
Clemow, Lynn
Rosal, Milagros C.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Family Medicine & Community HealthDepartment of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2005-09-21Keywords
AgedColorectal Neoplasms
Data Collection
Female
Health Behavior
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Male
Mass Screening
Middle Aged
*Models, Theoretical
*Patient Compliance
Regression Analysis
United States
Life Sciences
Medicine and Health Sciences
Women's Studies
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: There has been limited use of stages of change models in characterizing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We assess the applicability of the Precaution Adoption Model (PAPM) by determining the distribution of stages of adoption and by elucidating differences among stages. METHODS: The study is based on 1394 responses (69%) to a survey mailed in 2002 to patients in a primary care population. Survey measures included: self-reported CRC screening, sociodemographic characteristics, health system characteristics, attitudes and beliefs about CRC screening, perceived vulnerability to CRC, and worry about CRC. The main outcome was PAPM stage of adoption of CRC screening based on the ACS preferred guidelines: colonoscopy every 10 years alone or the combination annual FOBT plus sigmoidoscopy every 5 years. RESULTS: 57% were up-to-date with at least one test; 36% were up-to-date with the ACS preferred guidelines; provider recommendation, positive family history of CRC, and positive decisional balance score were significantly associated with higher compared to lower PAPM stages. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of PAPM stage assignment and other factors provides useful information for designing tailored interventions. There are special challenges in developing and interpreting PAPM stage assignments when a guideline offers multiple pathways to adherence and recommends a combination of two tests as a preferred option.Source
Prev Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;41(3-4):707-19. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.12.013Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/50629PubMed ID
16171854Related Resources
Link to article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.12.013