Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCostanza, Mary E.
dc.contributor.authorLuckmann, Roger S
dc.contributor.authorStoddard, Anne M.
dc.contributor.authorAvrunin, Jill S.
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Mary Jo
dc.contributor.authorStark, Jennifer Rider
dc.contributor.authorClemow, Lynn
dc.contributor.authorRosal, Milagros C.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:11:04.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:30:59Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:30:59Z
dc.date.issued2005-09-21
dc.date.submitted2007-07-30
dc.identifier.citationPrev Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;41(3-4):707-19. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.12.013">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0091-7435 (Print)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.12.013
dc.identifier.pmid16171854
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/50629
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: There has been limited use of stages of change models in characterizing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We assess the applicability of the Precaution Adoption Model (PAPM) by determining the distribution of stages of adoption and by elucidating differences among stages. METHODS: The study is based on 1394 responses (69%) to a survey mailed in 2002 to patients in a primary care population. Survey measures included: self-reported CRC screening, sociodemographic characteristics, health system characteristics, attitudes and beliefs about CRC screening, perceived vulnerability to CRC, and worry about CRC. The main outcome was PAPM stage of adoption of CRC screening based on the ACS preferred guidelines: colonoscopy every 10 years alone or the combination annual FOBT plus sigmoidoscopy every 5 years. RESULTS: 57% were up-to-date with at least one test; 36% were up-to-date with the ACS preferred guidelines; provider recommendation, positive family history of CRC, and positive decisional balance score were significantly associated with higher compared to lower PAPM stages. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of PAPM stage assignment and other factors provides useful information for designing tailored interventions. There are special challenges in developing and interpreting PAPM stage assignments when a guideline offers multiple pathways to adherence and recommends a combination of two tests as a preferred option.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=16171854&dopt=Abstract">Link to article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.12.013
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectColorectal Neoplasms
dc.subjectData Collection
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHealth Behavior
dc.subjectHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMass Screening
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subject*Models, Theoretical
dc.subject*Patient Compliance
dc.subjectRegression Analysis
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.subjectWomen's Studies
dc.titleApplying a stage model of behavior change to colon cancer screening
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitlePreventive medicine
dc.source.volume41
dc.source.issue3-4
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/wfc_pp/157
dc.identifier.contextkey330393
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: There has been limited use of stages of change models in characterizing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We assess the applicability of the Precaution Adoption Model (PAPM) by determining the distribution of stages of adoption and by elucidating differences among stages.</p> <p>METHODS: The study is based on 1394 responses (69%) to a survey mailed in 2002 to patients in a primary care population. Survey measures included: self-reported CRC screening, sociodemographic characteristics, health system characteristics, attitudes and beliefs about CRC screening, perceived vulnerability to CRC, and worry about CRC. The main outcome was PAPM stage of adoption of CRC screening based on the ACS preferred guidelines: colonoscopy every 10 years alone or the combination annual FOBT plus sigmoidoscopy every 5 years.</p> <p>RESULTS: 57% were up-to-date with at least one test; 36% were up-to-date with the ACS preferred guidelines; provider recommendation, positive family history of CRC, and positive decisional balance score were significantly associated with higher compared to lower PAPM stages.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: The combination of PAPM stage assignment and other factors provides useful information for designing tailored interventions. There are special challenges in developing and interpreting PAPM stage assignments when a guideline offers multiple pathways to adherence and recommends a combination of two tests as a preferred option.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathwfc_pp/157
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine & Community Health
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology
dc.source.pages707-19


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record