Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Robert J.
dc.contributor.authorGore, Joel M.
dc.contributor.authorLove, Donald G.
dc.contributor.authorOckene, Judith K.
dc.contributor.authorDalen, James E.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:11:04.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:31:46Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:31:46Z
dc.date.issued1984-09-01
dc.date.submitted2008-02-05
dc.identifier.citation<p>Ann Emerg Med. 1984 Sep;13(9 Pt 1):701-4.</p>
dc.identifier.issn0196-0644 (Print)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0196-0644(84)80731-3
dc.identifier.pmid6465651
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/50809
dc.description.abstractA case-control study was undertaken to examine differences in the extent of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training among family members of patients with and without coronary heart disease. There were no significant differences in the proportion of family members of patients with coronary disease (22.0%) who had ever taken a CPR course compared to family members of patients seen in a primary care clinic (25.6%) or in randomly selected neighborhood controls (28.7%). Family members of patients with coronary disease, however, had not only taken fewer CPR courses but had taken these courses considerably further in the past than had respective comparison groups. Moreover only 9% of these family members had taken CPR due to their family member's coronary disease.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=6465651&dopt=Abstract ">Link to article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(84)80731-3
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAge Factors
dc.subject*Coronary Disease
dc.subjectData Collection
dc.subjectEducational Status
dc.subject*Family
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMassachusetts
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectResuscitation
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.subjectWomen's Studies
dc.titleLayperson CPR--are we training the right people
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleAnnals of emergency medicine
dc.source.volume13
dc.source.issue9 Pt 1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/wfc_pp/337
dc.identifier.contextkey422984
html.description.abstract<p>A case-control study was undertaken to examine differences in the extent of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training among family members of patients with and without coronary heart disease. There were no significant differences in the proportion of family members of patients with coronary disease (22.0%) who had ever taken a CPR course compared to family members of patients seen in a primary care clinic (25.6%) or in randomly selected neighborhood controls (28.7%). Family members of patients with coronary disease, however, had not only taken fewer CPR courses but had taken these courses considerably further in the past than had respective comparison groups. Moreover only 9% of these family members had taken CPR due to their family member's coronary disease.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathwfc_pp/337
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine
dc.source.pages701-4


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record