Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRosal, Milagros C.
dc.contributor.authorOckene, Judith K.
dc.contributor.authorLuckmann, Roger S.
dc.contributor.authorZapka, Jane G.
dc.contributor.authorGoins, Karin V.
dc.contributor.authorSaperia, Gordon M.
dc.contributor.authorMason, Theresa
dc.contributor.authorDonnelly, Gary
dc.date2022-08-11T08:11:05.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:32:08Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:32:08Z
dc.date.issued2004-08-01
dc.date.submitted2008-02-26
dc.identifier.citationAm J Prev Med. 2004 Aug;27(2 Suppl):54-60. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.020">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0749-3797 (Print)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.020
dc.identifier.pmid15275674
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/50891
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Although primary care physicians understand the importance of preventive services for patients with multiple risk factors (MRF) for coronary heart disease, physician intervention is limited. This study investigated (1) physicians' views of challenges faced in managing patients with MRF; (2) the counseling and management methods they utilize; and (3) possible strategies to enhance MRF intervention in the primary care setting. METHODS: Two focus groups were conducted with primary care physicians from varying settings to gain insight into these issues noted above. Each group was co-facilitated by a physician and a behavioral scientist using a previously developed semistructured interview guide. The group discussions were tape recorded and subsequently transcribed. Transcripts were analyzed using the constant comparative method for analysis. RESULTS: Physicians are challenged by knowledge limitations (contribution of individual risk factors to overall risk); limited support (guidelines, materials, and staff); and logistic difficulties (organizational issues, time limitations). Their approach to MRF management tends to be highly individualized with an initial preference for lifestyle change interventions rather than prescription of medications with some qualifying circumstances. Physicians favored a serial rather than a parallel approach to MRF intervention, starting with behaviors that the patient perceives as a priority. Proposed solutions to current challenges emphasize physician education and the development of innovative approaches that include physician assistance and a team approach. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians are aware of and sensitive to the complexity of MRF management for their patients and themselves. However, future MRF interventions will require nonphysician staff involvement and increased systems support.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15275674&dopt=Abstract ">Link to article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.020
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectCoronary Disease
dc.subjectDiabetes Complications
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFocus Groups
dc.subject*Health Behavior
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectHypertension
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subject*Physician-Patient Relations
dc.subjectPreventive Health Services
dc.subject*Primary Health Care
dc.subjectRisk Factors
dc.subjectSmoking
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.subjectWomen's Studies
dc.titleCoronary heart disease multiple risk factor reduction. Providers' perspectives
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleAmerican journal of preventive medicine
dc.source.volume27
dc.source.issue2 Suppl
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/wfc_pp/420
dc.identifier.contextkey437176
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: Although primary care physicians understand the importance of preventive services for patients with multiple risk factors (MRF) for coronary heart disease, physician intervention is limited. This study investigated (1) physicians' views of challenges faced in managing patients with MRF; (2) the counseling and management methods they utilize; and (3) possible strategies to enhance MRF intervention in the primary care setting.</p> <p>METHODS: Two focus groups were conducted with primary care physicians from varying settings to gain insight into these issues noted above. Each group was co-facilitated by a physician and a behavioral scientist using a previously developed semistructured interview guide. The group discussions were tape recorded and subsequently transcribed. Transcripts were analyzed using the constant comparative method for analysis.</p> <p>RESULTS: Physicians are challenged by knowledge limitations (contribution of individual risk factors to overall risk); limited support (guidelines, materials, and staff); and logistic difficulties (organizational issues, time limitations). Their approach to MRF management tends to be highly individualized with an initial preference for lifestyle change interventions rather than prescription of medications with some qualifying circumstances. Physicians favored a serial rather than a parallel approach to MRF intervention, starting with behaviors that the patient perceives as a priority. Proposed solutions to current challenges emphasize physician education and the development of innovative approaches that include physician assistance and a team approach.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Physicians are aware of and sensitive to the complexity of MRF management for their patients and themselves. However, future MRF interventions will require nonphysician staff involvement and increased systems support.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathwfc_pp/420
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine
dc.source.pages54-60


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record