Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOckene, Judith K.
dc.contributor.authorKristeller, Jean L.
dc.contributor.authorPbert, Lori
dc.contributor.authorHebert, James R.
dc.contributor.authorLuippold, Rose S.
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Robert J.
dc.contributor.authorLandon, Joan
dc.contributor.authorKalan, Kathryn L.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:11:05.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:32:18Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:32:18Z
dc.date.issued1994-05-01
dc.date.submitted2008-03-04
dc.identifier.citation<p>Health Psychol. 1994 May;13(3):278-81.</p>
dc.identifier.issn0278-6133 (Print)
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/0278-6133.13.3.278
dc.identifier.pmid8055863
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/50922
dc.description.abstractPatterns of smoking cessation using 6- and 12-month follow-up data are reported for 1,261 primary care patients randomized to 3 physician-delivered smoking interventions: advice only (AO), counseling (CI), and counseling plus availability of nicotine-containing gum (CI + NCG). One-week-point-prevalence cessation rates at 12 months did not differ among the interventions: AO (15.2%), CI (12.9%) and CI + NCG (16.7%). However, maintained cessation rates (abstinent at both 6 and 12 months) increased with intervention intensity: AO (6.0%), CI (7.8%) and CI + NCG (10.0%): Test of trend chi 2 = 5.06, p = .02. CI + NCG was significantly higher than AO (p = .02). The findings support the following conclusions: Brief physician-delivered intervention with availability of nicotine-containing gum can have a beneficial long-term effect on smoking cessation, and cohort data as well as point-prevalence rates are important when assessing the long-term impact of lifestyle interventions.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8055863&dopt=Abstract ">Link to article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.13.3.278
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAmbulatory Care
dc.subjectChewing Gum
dc.subjectCohort Studies
dc.subjectCounseling
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studies
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectNicotine
dc.subject*Patient Education as Topic
dc.subject*Physician-Patient Relations
dc.subjectPrimary Health Care
dc.subjectSmoking Cessation
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.subjectWomen's Studies
dc.titleThe physician-delivered smoking intervention project: can short-term interventions produce long-term effects for a general outpatient population
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association
dc.source.volume13
dc.source.issue3
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/wfc_pp/450
dc.identifier.contextkey447506
html.description.abstract<p>Patterns of smoking cessation using 6- and 12-month follow-up data are reported for 1,261 primary care patients randomized to 3 physician-delivered smoking interventions: advice only (AO), counseling (CI), and counseling plus availability of nicotine-containing gum (CI + NCG). One-week-point-prevalence cessation rates at 12 months did not differ among the interventions: AO (15.2%), CI (12.9%) and CI + NCG (16.7%). However, maintained cessation rates (abstinent at both 6 and 12 months) increased with intervention intensity: AO (6.0%), CI (7.8%) and CI + NCG (10.0%): Test of trend chi 2 = 5.06, p = .02. CI + NCG was significantly higher than AO (p = .02). The findings support the following conclusions: Brief physician-delivered intervention with availability of nicotine-containing gum can have a beneficial long-term effect on smoking cessation, and cohort data as well as point-prevalence rates are important when assessing the long-term impact of lifestyle interventions.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathwfc_pp/450
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine
dc.source.pages278-81


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record