Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrambilla, Donald J.
dc.contributor.authorMcKinlay, Sonja M.
dc.contributor.authorMcKinlay, John B.
dc.contributor.authorWeiss, S R
dc.contributor.authorJohannes, Catherine B.
dc.contributor.authorCrawford, Sybil L.
dc.contributor.authorLongcope, Christopher
dc.date2022-08-11T08:11:05.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:32:57Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:32:57Z
dc.date.issued1996-03-01
dc.date.submitted2007-05-10
dc.identifier.citation<p>J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Mar;49(3):345-50.</p>
dc.identifier.issn0895-4356 (Print)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/0895-4356(95)00569-2
dc.identifier.pmid8676183
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/51063
dc.description.abstractMeasuring levels of steroid hormones in epidemiologic studies is difficult because pulsatile release can cause the levels of many hormones to vary markedly over short intervals, leading to a loss of precision in between-subject comparisons. Clinicians often control this variation by collecting several samples from each subject at defined intervals and pooling these samples for assay. The number of samples per subject that would adequately control such variation in an epidemiologic study has not been fully investigated. This study examines the effects of collecting 1, 2, or 3 samples per subject on the variances of 11 hormones and sex hormone binding globulin in men and 6 hormones in women. Three samples were collected at 30-minute intervals from each of 20 men and 59 women and were assayed separately. Variances that would be obtained in studies collecting one, two, or three samples per subject were then estimated. Collecting more than one sample substantially reduced the variances of several hormones in men but not in women.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8676183&dopt=Abstract">Link to article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(95)00569-2
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAnalysis of Variance
dc.subjectBlood Specimen Collection
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectGonadal Steroid Hormones
dc.subjectGonadotropins, Pituitary
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectObserver Variation
dc.subjectPilot Projects
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.subjectWomen's Studies
dc.titleDoes collecting repeated blood samples from each subject improve the precision of estimated steroid hormone levels
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of clinical epidemiology
dc.source.volume49
dc.source.issue3
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/wfc_pp/75
dc.identifier.contextkey304858
html.description.abstract<p>Measuring levels of steroid hormones in epidemiologic studies is difficult because pulsatile release can cause the levels of many hormones to vary markedly over short intervals, leading to a loss of precision in between-subject comparisons. Clinicians often control this variation by collecting several samples from each subject at defined intervals and pooling these samples for assay. The number of samples per subject that would adequately control such variation in an epidemiologic study has not been fully investigated. This study examines the effects of collecting 1, 2, or 3 samples per subject on the variances of 11 hormones and sex hormone binding globulin in men and 6 hormones in women. Three samples were collected at 30-minute intervals from each of 20 men and 59 women and were assayed separately. Variances that would be obtained in studies collecting one, two, or three samples per subject were then estimated. Collecting more than one sample substantially reduced the variances of several hormones in men but not in women.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathwfc_pp/75
dc.contributor.departmentNew England Research Institutes
dc.source.pages345-50


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record