Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRonneberg, Corina R
dc.contributor.authorLv, Nan
dc.contributor.authorAjilore, Olusola A
dc.contributor.authorGerber, Ben S
dc.contributor.authorVenditti, Elizabeth M
dc.contributor.authorSnowden, Mark B
dc.contributor.authorSteinman, Lesley E
dc.contributor.authorWittels, Nancy E
dc.contributor.authorBarve, Amruta
dc.contributor.authorDosala, Sushanth
dc.contributor.authorRosas, Lisa G
dc.contributor.authorKringle, Emily A
dc.contributor.authorMa, Jun
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-26T15:04:00Z
dc.date.available2022-10-26T15:04:00Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-25
dc.identifier.citationRonneberg CR, Lv N, Ajilore OA, Gerber BS, Venditti EM, Snowden MB, Steinman LE, Wittels NE, Barve A, Dosala S, Rosas LG, Kringle EA, Ma J. Integrated collaborative care intervention for depression and obesity in primary care: translation from research to practice. Health Educ Res. 2022 Aug 1;37(4):227-241. doi: 10.1093/her/cyac017. PMID: 35876850; PMCID: PMC9340965.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1465-3648
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/her/cyac017en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35876850
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/51217
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to present lessons learned about engagement, delivery modality and pandemic impact while delivering a collaborative care intervention with a socioeconomically, racially and ethnically diverse sample. Participants completed a post-intervention survey (n = 41) on experiences and preferred intervention delivery modality, coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) Impact Survey (n = 50) and provided open-ended feedback about the intervention (n = 27). Intervention process data included attendance, modality, and withdrawals. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inductive content analyses. Of 71 intervention participants, 6 (8%) withdrew before session 1. Completers adhered to intervention timeline better than withdrawals. Participants liked the in-person interaction, efficient coach support, accountability of in-person and Zoom vs. phone sessions and the flexibility and convenience of phone and Zoom vs. in-person sessions. A majority of participants reported experiencing pandemic impacts such as heightened emotional distress, decreased activity engagement, poorer eating behaviors and being unable to meet basic needs. Participants deviating from intervention timelines may be re-engaged by targeted outreach attempts. Videoconference has the potential for providing as-needed coaching. Future interventions may be optimized to account for and address areas impacted by the pandemic. Findings revealed specific strategies that can be implemented in future interventions to improve emotional and physical health among diverse populations.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofHealth Education Researchen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyac017en_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.en_US
dc.titleIntegrated collaborative care intervention for depression and obesity in primary care: translation from research to practiceen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.source.journaltitleHealth education research
dc.source.volume37
dc.source.issue4
dc.source.beginpage227
dc.source.endpage241
dc.source.countryUnited States
dc.source.countryEngland
dc.identifier.journalHealth education research
dc.contributor.departmentPopulation and Quantitative Health Sciencesen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record