Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchutt, Russell K
dc.contributor.authorXie, Haiyi
dc.contributor.authorMueser, Kim T
dc.contributor.authorKillam, Matthew A
dc.contributor.authorDelman, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorEack, Shaun M
dc.contributor.authorMesholam-Gately, Raquelle
dc.contributor.authorPratt, Sarah I
dc.contributor.authorSandoval, Luis
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Meghan M
dc.contributor.authorGolden, Laura R
dc.contributor.authorKeshavan, Matcheri S
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-02T21:48:42Z
dc.date.available2022-12-02T21:48:42Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-01
dc.identifier.citationSchutt RK, Xie H, Mueser KT, Killam MA, Delman J, Eack SM, Mesholam-Gately R, Pratt SI, Sandoval L, Santos MM, Golden LR, Keshavan MS. Cognitive Enhancement Therapy vs social skills training in schizophrenia: a cluster randomized comparative effectiveness evaluation. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 1;22(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04149-x. Erratum in: BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 16;22(1):613. PMID: 36050663; PMCID: PMC9434502.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1471-244X
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12888-022-04149-xen_US
dc.identifier.pmid36050663
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/51361
dc.description.abstractBackground: Schizophrenia and related disorders are highly disabling and create substantial burdens for families, communities, and health care systems. Although pharmacological treatments can often lessen the psychotic symptoms that are a hallmark of schizophrenia, they do not lessen the social and cognitive deficits that create the greatest impediments to community engagement and functional recovery. This study builds on prior research on psychosocial rehabilitation by comparing the effectiveness of two treatments demonstrated as efficacious in improving social and community functioning, Cognitive Enhancement Therapy (CET) and a version of Social Skills Training (HOPES/SST). Methods: The study uses a randomized cluster design in which a pair of clinicians at community- and hospital-based mental service centers deliver either CET or HOPES to at least one group of 6-8 eligible clients for 12 months. Clinicians are trained and then supervised weekly, with ongoing process measurement of treatment fidelity, attendance, satisfaction, and retention, and use of other services. Measures administered at baseline and at 6 and 12 months while in treatment, and then at 18 and 24 months after treatment include social adjustment, quality of life, social skills, positive and negative symptoms, and neuro- and social cognition. We hypothesize that CET will be associated with greater improvements than SST in both the primary outcome of community functioning and the secondary outcomes of neuro- and social cognition and social skills. Secondarily, we hypothesize that more cognitive impairment at baseline and younger age will predict more benefit from CET compared to HOPES. Discussion: Resource shortages endemic in mental health services and exacerbated by the pandemic highlight the importance of identifying the most effective approach to improving social and community functioning. We aim to improve understanding of the impact of two efficacious psychosocial treatments and to improve clinicians' ability to refer to both treatments the individuals who are most likely to benefit from them. We expect the result to be programmatic improvements that improve the magnitude and durability of gains in community functioning. Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04321759 , registered March 25, 2020.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Psychiatryen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04149-xen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022. Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectCluster randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.subjectCognitive enhancement therapyen_US
dc.subjectCognitive remediationen_US
dc.subjectCommunity functioningen_US
dc.subjectNeurocognitionen_US
dc.subjectPsychosocial rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectSchizophreniaen_US
dc.subjectSocial cognitionen_US
dc.subjectSocial skills trainingen_US
dc.titleCognitive Enhancement Therapy vs social skills training in schizophrenia: a cluster randomized comparative effectiveness evaluationen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.source.journaltitleBMC psychiatry
dc.source.volume22
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage583
dc.source.endpage
dc.source.countryEngland
dc.identifier.journalBMC psychiatry
refterms.dateFOA2022-12-02T21:48:43Z
dc.contributor.departmentPsychiatryen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
s12888-022-04149-x.pdf
Size:
1.660Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022. Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you
give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes
were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated
otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not
permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To
view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver
(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a
credit line to the data.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022. Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.