• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Departments, Programs and Centers
    • Population and Quantitative Health Sciences
    • Population and Quantitative Health Sciences Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Departments, Programs and Centers
    • Population and Quantitative Health Sciences
    • Population and Quantitative Health Sciences Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of eScholarship@UMassChanCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywordsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywords

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutSubmission GuidelinesData Deposit PolicySearchingAccessibilityTerms of UseWebsite Migration FAQ

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Effect of a Machine Learning Recommender System and Viral Peer Marketing Intervention on Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    faro_2023_oi_221444_1672346528 ...
    Size:
    928.5Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Authors
    Faro, Jamie M
    Chen, Jinying
    Flahive, Julie
    Nagawa, Catherine S
    Orvek, Elizabeth A
    Houston, Thomas K
    Allison, Jeroan J
    Person, Sharina D
    Smith, Bridget M
    Blok, Amanda C
    Sadasivam, Rajani S
    Show allShow less
    UMass Chan Affiliations
    Population and Quantitative Health Sciences
    Document Type
    Journal Article
    Publication Date
    2023-01-03
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Link to Full Text
    https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50665
    Abstract
    Importance: Novel data science and marketing methods of smoking-cessation intervention have not been adequately evaluated. Objective: To compare machine learning recommender (ML recommender) computer tailoring of motivational text messages vs a standard motivational text-based intervention (standard messaging) and a viral peer-recruitment tool kit (viral tool kit) for recruiting friends and family vs no tool kit in a smoking-cessation intervention. Design, setting, and participants: This 2 ×2 factorial randomized clinical trial with partial allocation, conducted between July 2017 and September 2019 within an online tobacco intervention, recruited current smokers aged 18 years and older who spoke English from the US via the internet and peer referral. Data were analyzed from March through May 2022. Interventions: Participants registering for the online intervention were randomly assigned to the ML recommender or standard messaging groups followed by partially random allocation to access to viral tool kit or no viral tool kit groups. The ML recommender provided ongoing refinement of message selection based on user feedback and comparison with a growing database of other users, while the standard system selected messages based on participant baseline readiness to quit. Main outcomes and measures: Our primary outcome was self-reported 7-day point prevalence smoking cessation at 6 months. Results: Of 1487 participants who smoked (444 aged 19-34 years [29.9%], 508 aged 35-54 years [34.1%], 535 aged ≥55 years [36.0%]; 1101 [74.0%] females; 189 Black [12.7%] and 1101 White [78.5%]; 106 Hispanic [7.1%]), 741 individuals were randomly assigned to the ML recommender group and 746 individuals to the standard messaging group; viral tool kit access was provided to 745 participants, and 742 participants received no such access. There was no significant difference in 6-month smoking cessation between ML recommender (146 of 412 participants [35.4%] with outcome data) and standard messaging (156 of 389 participants [40.1%] with outcome data) groups (adjusted odds ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.61-1.08). Smoking cessation was significantly higher in viral tool kit (177 of 395 participants [44.8%] with outcome data) vs no viral tool kit (125 of 406 participants [30.8%] with outcome data) groups (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.11-1.98). Conclusions and relevance: In this study, machine learning-based selection did not improve performance compared with standard message selection, while viral marketing did improve cessation outcomes. These results suggest that in addition to increasing dissemination, viral recruitment may have important implications for improving effectiveness of smoking-cessation interventions. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03224520.
    Source
    Faro JM, Chen J, Flahive J, Nagawa CS, Orvek EA, Houston TK, Allison JJ, Person SD, Smith BM, Blok AC, Sadasivam RS. Effect of a Machine Learning Recommender System and Viral Peer Marketing Intervention on Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2250665. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50665. PMID: 36633844; PMCID: PMC9856644.
    DOI
    10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50665
    Permanent Link to this Item
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/51845
    PubMed ID
    36633844
    Rights
    Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50665
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Population and Quantitative Health Sciences Publications

    entitlement

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Lamar Soutter Library, UMass Chan Medical School | 55 Lake Avenue North | Worcester, MA 01655 USA
    Quick Guide | escholarship@umassmed.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.