Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWang, C Jason
dc.contributor.authorLittle, Alison A
dc.contributor.authorKamholz, Karen
dc.contributor.authorHolliman, Jaime Bruce
dc.contributor.authorWise, Marissa D
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorRinger, Steven
dc.contributor.authorCole, Cynthia
dc.contributor.authorVanderveen, Deborah K
dc.contributor.authorChristiansen, Stephen P
dc.contributor.authorBauchner, Howard
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-08T14:17:28Z
dc.date.available2023-05-08T14:17:28Z
dc.date.issued2012-11-01
dc.identifier.citationWang CJ, Little AA, Kamholz K, Holliman JB, Wise MD, Davis J, Ringer S, Cole C, Vanderveen DK, Christiansen SP, Bauchner H. Improving preterm ophthalmologic care in the era of accountable care organizations. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Nov;130(11):1433-40. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1890. PMID: 22777426.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1538-3601
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1890en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22777426
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/52037
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES To understand retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) follow-up care for preterm very low-birth-weight infants (VLBW; <1500 g) in the context of the chronic care model and identify opportunities for improvement under accountable care organizations. METHODS We conducted focus groups and interviews with parents (N = 47) of VLBW infants and interviews with neonatal intensive care unit and ophthalmologic providers (N = 28) at 6 sites in Massachusetts and South Carolina. Themes are reported according to consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research guidelines. RESULTS Respondents perceived that legal liability and low reimbursement contributed to shortages of ROP providers. Some neonatal intensive care units offered subsidies to attract ophthalmologic providers or delayed transfers to institutions that could not provide ROP examinations and/or treatment. Sites used variable practices for coordinating ROP care. Even at sites with a tracking database and a dedicated ROP coordinator, significant time was required to ensure that examinations and treatment occurred as scheduled. Parents' ability to manage their children's health care was limited by parental understanding of ROP, feeling overwhelmed by the infant's care, and unmet needs for resources to address social stressors. CONCLUSIONS Under accountable care organizations, hospitals and ophthalmology practices should share responsibility for ensuring coordinated ROP care to mitigate liability concerns. To promote integrated care, reimbursement for ROP care should be bundled to include screening, diagnosis, treatment, and appropriate follow-up. Clinical information systems should be enhanced to increase efficiency and limit lapses in care. Self-management tools and connections to community resources could help promote families' attendance of follow-up appointments.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1890en_US
dc.titleImproving preterm ophthalmologic care in the era of accountable care organizationsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.source.journaltitleArchives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)
dc.source.volume130
dc.source.issue11
dc.source.beginpage1433
dc.source.endpage40
dc.source.countryUnited States
dc.identifier.journalArchives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)
dc.contributor.departmentT.H. Chan School of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.studentAlison Littleen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record